Where does the energy loss from redshifted photons go?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter josephpalazzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of redshift in photons as they transition from high gravity fields to low gravity fields, specifically addressing the question of where the energy loss associated with this redshift goes. The scope includes theoretical considerations in general relativity and the implications for energy conservation in gravitational fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that when a photon is redshifted, it has less energy, prompting the question of where this energy loss goes.
  • One participant explains that the concept of energy in general relativity (GR) is subtle, noting that energy is not conserved locally but rather at infinity, particularly when discussing photons falling into black holes.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the frequency of light does not change as it moves through a gravitational field; rather, it is the measurement by local observers that varies based on their gravitational potential.
  • Some participants reference Lev B. Okun's work, suggesting that the energy of a photon is conserved in a static gravitational field, and provide equations relating to coordinate measurements of frequency, wavelength, momentum, speed, and energy as perceived by observers at different gravitational potentials.
  • One participant proposes that the observed redshift is not an intrinsic property of the photon but results from the relative motion of the absorber compared to the emitter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of energy conservation in gravitational fields and the interpretation of redshift. There is no consensus on the mechanisms behind energy loss or the implications of redshift, indicating a contested discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the understanding of energy conservation in GR, particularly regarding the definitions and assumptions involved in measuring energy at different gravitational potentials. The complexity of these concepts remains unresolved.

josephpalazzo
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
When a photon passes from a high gravity field to a low gravity field, it is redshifted. Therefore it has less energy. Where does that energy loss go to?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The local energy of the photon does not stay constant, however, the energy at infinity does and is furthermore constant. (Energy-at-infinity is a term used in MTW's Gravitation).

If a photon falls into a black hole, it is not the energy of the photon that gets added to the black hole, but the energy at infinity. So when you think of conserved energy in GR, don't think of the local energy as being conserved, but rather the "energy at infinity".

This is a very rough overview, the concept of energy in GR is quite subtle and is different from the concept in other areas of physics. There is no *general* notion of conserved energy in GR, but for important cases such as photons falling into Schwarzschild black holes, there are useful concepts of energy.

For more on energy in GR that is not too technical, try the sci.physics.faq:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/energy_gr.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mass_in_general_relativity&oldid=186756158

might also be useful
 
josephpalazzo said:
When a photon passes from a high gravity field to a low gravity field, it is redshifted. Therefore it has less energy. Where does that energy loss go to?
The frequency of light does not change as if moves through a gravitational field. What changes is the frequency as measured by local observers. I.e. an observer at a particular position in at a high gravitational potential will measure a frequency which is higher that an observer at a lower position will. However any particular observer will measure a constant frequency. The energy of a photon moving through a gravitational field is conserved if the field is static. Lev B. Okun published an article on this topic. It copy is located at http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/0010/0010120v2.pdf

Best wishes

Pete
 
pmb_phy said:
The frequency of light does not change as if moves through a gravitational field. What changes is the frequency as measured by local observers. I.e. an observer at a particular position in at a high gravitational potential will measure a frequency which is higher that an observer at a lower position will. However any particular observer will measure a constant frequency. The energy of a photon moving through a gravitational field is conserved if the field is static. Lev B. Okun published an article on this topic. It copy is located at http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ph/pdf/0010/0010120v2.pdf

Best wishes

Pete

My interpretation of that paper is as follows.

Measurements of a photon made by a distant observer (at infinity):

Coordinate frequency w = w_o ,

Coordinate wavelength \lambda = {\lambda_o \over g^2} ,

Coordinate momentum p = p_o g^2 ,

Coordinate speed c = {c_o \over g^2} and

Coordinate energy E = homework = {hc \over \lambda}= pc = E_o

Where g = {1 \over \sqrt{\left( 1-{GM \over R c^2}\right)}} and w_o , p_o , c_o , \lambda_o , E_o are measurements of the photon at infinity made by the observer at infinity.

Measurements of a photon made by a stationary local observer:

w = {w_o g} ,

\lambda = {\lambda_o \over g} ,

p = {p_o g} ,

c = c_o and

E = homework = pc_o = {hc_o \over \lambda} = {E_o g}


On the other hand, the rest energy of a particle with non zero rest mass, increases higher up in the gravity well. Conversely, this implies (from the formula given) that the rest mass of a brick lowered towards a black hole goes to zero at the event horizon. The paper seems to suggest that the rest mass represents the gravitational potential energy of the particle.
 
Last edited:
josephpalazzo said:
When a photon passes from a high gravity field to a low gravity field, it is redshifted. Therefore it has less energy. Where does that energy loss go to?
The observed redshift of the photon has nothing to do with the photon but is due to the relative blueshift of the absorber compared to the emitter.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
959
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K