Where is the Mistake in Eq. 3?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pachito
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mistake
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the error in the integration of Equation 3 (Eq. 3) in relation to the numerical solution of Equation 1 (Eq. 1). The mistake identified is the incorrect assumption that exp(kt)dx is equivalent to d(x exp(kt)). The correct approach requires integrating exp(kt(x))dx, acknowledging that t is a function of x, rather than treating t as a constant. Consequently, Equation 4 (Eq. 4) is deemed false due to this oversight.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations and integration techniques
  • Familiarity with the concept of variable functions
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their properties
  • Basic grasp of numerical solutions in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integration of variable functions in differential equations
  • Learn about the properties of exponential functions in calculus
  • Explore numerical methods for solving differential equations
  • Review the relationship between reciprocal functions and their integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone involved in solving differential equations or analyzing mathematical models that involve variable functions.

Pachito
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello
everything follows up well, but when I compare the result (eq. 5) with the numerical solution of eq. 1, then are different. Where is the mistake? eq. 3?
thanks
 

Attachments

  • problem.JPG
    problem.JPG
    17.8 KB · Views: 490
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The mistake is in the integration of eq.[3] because
exp(kt)dx isn't equal to d(x exp(kt) )
So, Eq.[4] is false.
Do not forget that t is function of x.
t(x) is the reciprocal function of x(t)
So you would have to integrate exp(kt(x))dx, not simply exp(kt)dx with t constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K