Where to place Gaussian surface

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field between two oppositely charged plates of equal magnitude. Participants are exploring the implications of choosing a Gaussian surface that either includes parts of the plates or is entirely between them.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning why a Gaussian surface must include parts of the charged plates to determine the electric field, noting that a surface placed entirely between the plates would enclose no charge and thus suggest a zero electric field, which contradicts their understanding of the situation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between enclosed charge and net flux, emphasizing that a zero net flux does not imply a zero electric field in the region between the plates. The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored regarding the placement of the Gaussian surface.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of the Gaussian surface placement and its relation to the electric field, with participants considering the effects of charge distribution and the definition of electric flux.

henry3369
Messages
194
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to calculate the electric field through two oppositely charged plates with the same magnitude:
http://imgur.com/uXCQqtW

Homework Equations


Flux = ∫E⋅dA = Qenclosed0

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand how the electric field is calculated using S1 and S4, but I have one question:
Why did the Gaussian surface have to contain a part of the plates? I ask this because if the surface was chosen to be between the plates, but not containing any parts of the plates, the electric field would be zero, since Qenclosed is zero and the area, A, as well as ε are both constants. But, the electric field is definitely not zero between the plates.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
henry3369 said:

Homework Statement


I'm trying to calculate the electric field through two oppositely charged plates with the same magnitude:
http://imgur.com/uXCQqtW

Homework Equations


Flux = ∫E⋅dA = Qenclosed0

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand how the electric field is calculated using S1 and S4, but I have one question:
Why did the Gaussian surface have to contain a part of the plates? I ask this because if the surface was chosen to be between the plates, but not containing any parts of the plates, the electric field would be zero, since Qenclosed is zero and the area, A, as well as ε are both constants. But, the electric field is definitely not zero between the plates.

The net flux is also zero if the flux across S1 and S4 (the opposite sides of the Gaussian surface) are of opposite signs and of equal magnitudes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ehild said:
The net flux is also zero if the flux across S1 and S4 (the opposite sides of the Gaussian surface) are of opposite signs and of equal magnitudes.
I'm not trying to find the net flux of S1 and S4. I'm using either S1 or S4 to find the electric field between the two charged plates. What I don't understand is why I can't use a Gaussian surface such as S1 and place it between the two plates without containing any parts of either plates to find the electric field. Because if it doesn't have any charge in it then E is zero because qenclosed is zero. But there obviously is an electric field between the plates.
 
You can place the Gaussian surface anywhere you want. The fact that:

Net flux of E through the surface = Charge inside the surface / epsilon_0

is true for any closed surface. If you place the surface with both faces between the plates, then the charge inside the surface is zero, and the net flux of E through the surface is also zero. But this does not mean that E =0 between the plates! There is a flux of E into the surface on one side, and a flux of E out of the surface on the other side, so the net flux of E through the surface is zero. You have to keep track of the signs. If you place the surface so that one face is between the plates and one face is inside the conductor (like S4), the flux of E through the part inside the conductor is zero, so you only have to consider the face inside the plates. The trick in these problems is cleverly choosing your Gaussian surface in order to make the calculation easy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K