MHB Which Coefficient Ring Makes f=x^2+1 Irreducible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poirot1
  • Start date Start date
Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
Consider the polynomial f=x^2+1. Regarded as a polynomial over which of the following coefficient rings is this polynomial irreducible?

(i) Z, (ii) R, (iii) C, (iv) Z mod 2. Give Reasons for your answer.

To be irreducible means (i) not a unit and (ii) if f=ab then a|f and b|f. As to the first, I don't think f is a unit in any of these.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Poirot said:
Consider the polynomial f=x^2+1. Regarded as a polynomial over which of the following coefficient rings is this polynomial irreducible?

(i) Z, (ii) R, (iii) C, (iv) Z mod 2. Give Reasons for your answer.

To be irreducible means (i) not a unit and (ii) if f=ab then a|f and b|f. As to the first, I don't think f is a unit in any of these.

Thanks


I don't think the way you have defined an irreducible polynomial is correct.
Condition (ii) is wrong.

edit: In fact, condition (ii) contains no information in it.
 
Should your definition of irreducible not be as follows:

For an integral domain $\mathcal{R}$,if $a\in\mathcal{R}$ and a is neither zero nor a unit;
we say that a is irreducible in $\mathcal{R}$ if whenever $a = cd$ for $c,d\in\mathcal{R}$ it follows that either c or d is a unit.
 
A polynomial $p(x)$ is said to be irreducible if don't exist two polynomials $a(x)$ and $b(x)$, both different from $p(x)$, so that $p(x)=a(x)\ b(x)$. In our case is $p(x)=1+x^{2}$ and we have...

(i) if the coefficients of $p(x)$ are in $\mathbb{Z}$, then $p(x)$ is irreducible...

(ii) if the coefficients of $p(x)$ are in $\mathbb{R}$, then $p(x)$ is irreducible...

(iii) if the coefficients of $p(x)$ are in $\mathbb{C}$, then $p(x)$ is not irreducible because is $1+x^{2}= (1-i\ x)\ (1+i\ x)$...

(iv) if the coefficients of $p(x)$ are in $\mathbb{Z}\ \text{mod}\ 2$, then $p(x)$ is not irreducible because is $1+x^{2}= (1+x)\ (1+x)$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
I just got it myeslf but thanks anyway.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top