Which engineering uses the most physics on the job?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Mechanical engineers often engage less in mathematical calculations early in their careers, focusing instead on tools like CATIA. The discussion emphasizes that the nature of engineering work varies significantly based on job roles and career trajectories. Electrical Engineering is highlighted as a field rich in applied physics, with professionals encouraged to proactively seek opportunities to apply physics and mathematics in their work. Ultimately, the discussion concludes that engineers must advocate for the integration of physics in their roles to enhance their job satisfaction and effectiveness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mechanical engineering principles
  • Familiarity with CATIA software
  • Basic knowledge of electrical engineering concepts
  • Awareness of career development strategies in engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced applications of physics in Electrical Engineering
  • Research career paths in mechanical engineering that emphasize applied physics
  • Learn about project management techniques to advocate for physics applications in engineering roles
  • Investigate the use of CATIA in complex engineering projects beyond entry-level tasks
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, electrical engineers, and engineering students interested in applying physics in their careers, as well as professionals seeking to enhance their job satisfaction through proactive career management.

zachdr1
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
I always hear that mechanical engineers (at least ones without a ton of experience) rarely ever do any math. I really enjoy studying mechanical engineering right now, and I really want to make sure that the stuff I'm studying is what I'll be using on the job.

How does a mechanical engineer (or any engineer) avoid doing work on CATIA all day, and instead do actual calculations and applied physics problems, and which engineering leans more towards the "solving applied physics problems" side?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know that it's so much a matter of selecting an appropriate "branch" of engineering as it is the actual job that you end up doing, and then the trajectory of your career. In a lot of entry level jobs the company likely won't want to have new hires working on complex problems. But as you progress the opportunities will be there, particularly if you seek them out. In my experience, people tend to gravitate towards the kinds of work that they enjoy doing in the long term. When they feel "stuck" it's often temporary.
 
I think Electrical Engineering has some of the most interesting physics in it. That's why I chose it as my engineering field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delong
Most of my career, I've viewed it as my job to recognize the applications of physics and math to the interests of my employers and clients. Often, they do not fully recognize the full range of how physics can be applied to help their bottom line or address their interests.

If you wait for employers and clients to realize how you can help them, there will be much less physics in your life.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog

Similar threads

  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K