Which Equation Correctly Represents the Planck Distribution?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mechatron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Mechatron
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Is this equation equal to:

(e^(hf/kT)) - 1

or

e^( (hf/kT) - 1 )

http://s29.postimg.org/le6iqy3rb/exp.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The former.
 
Mechatron said:
Is this equation equal to:

(e^(hf/kT)) - 1

or

e^( (hf/kT) - 1 )

http://s29.postimg.org/le6iqy3rb/exp.png
First off, what you wrote is NOT an equation. An equation always has an = symbol in it.

The image in the link is [exp(hf/kT) - 1].

What you have written is ambiguous, as what you probably meant is this:
$$e^{\frac{hf}{kT} - 1}$$

What you actually wrote, though, is this:
$$e^{\frac{hf}{k}T - 1}$$

The brackets - [] - around the entire expression are unnecessary.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mark44 said:
First off, what you wrote is NOT an equation. An equation always has an = symbol in it.

The image in the link is [exp(hf/kT) - 1].

What you have written is ambiguous, as what you probably meant is this:
$$e^{\frac{hf}{kT} - 1}$$

What you actually wrote, though, is this:
$$e^{\frac{hf}{k}T - 1}$$

The brackets - [] - around the entire expression are unnecessary.
Why did you put the -1 in the exponential? The parenthesis limit the argument of exp to hf/kT.

My guess is that Mechatron did not write that himself, but saw it in a book. It's most probably related to the Planck distribution (blackbody radiation). As economicsnerd said, the correct reading is
$$
e^{\beta h f} - 1 \mbox{ where } \beta = \frac{1}{kT}
$$
The additional bracket [] might be there because it is part of a greater equation.
 
Im sorry to be off topic but I'm using a i device and i can't see (what i think to be) mathematical symbols that are in this thread... They appear as dollar signs and other randoms, i was wondering if maybe I'm short of additional download or setting adjustments. All help is highly appreciated
 
DrClaude said:
Why did you put the -1 in the exponential? The parenthesis limit the argument of exp to hf/kT.
The posted image, which doesn't have the -1 term, doesn't match the expressions in the first post. In the first post Mechatron asks about these expressions:
(e^(hf/kT)) - 1

and

e^( (hf/kT) - 1 )

In any case, this is moot, as Mechatron has been banned from PF.

DrClaude said:
My guess is that Mechatron did not write that himself, but saw it in a book. It's most probably related to the Planck distribution (blackbody radiation). As economicsnerd said, the correct reading is
$$
e^{\beta h f} - 1 \mbox{ where } \beta = \frac{1}{kT}
$$
The additional bracket [] might be there because it is part of a greater equation.