Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the potential categories for the upcoming guru awards in the forum, including suggestions for new awards and reflections on past categories. Participants explore both serious and fun award categories, as well as the criteria for nominations and the implications of these awards.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express a desire to retain the same awards as last year, including categories like Physics Guru, Math Guru, and Community Spirit Award.
- There is a proposal for a new award, the Communicator Guru, based on insights from previous discussions.
- One participant suggests an award for a member with a statue made in their image, indicating a humorous take on awards.
- Concerns are raised about the Chemistry Guru award, with one participant questioning the qualifications of the previous winner and suggesting criteria for future recipients.
- A suggestion is made to reintroduce the "Most Improved Member" category, which had been dropped due to lack of nominations.
- Another participant humorously proposes the PF Darwin Award for members who have made particularly foolish contributions, sparking further discussion on the nature of such awards.
- There are discussions about the need for new smileys to enhance forum communication, with specific preferences expressed for certain designs.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants show a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the awards. While some categories are generally accepted, there are competing views on the necessity and criteria for certain awards, particularly the Chemistry Guru and the proposed new categories.
Contextual Notes
Participants express uncertainty about the nomination process and the implications of awards, particularly regarding the potential for members to feel insulted if not nominated. There are also concerns about the qualifications of previous award winners, which may affect future nominations.