Which High Altitude Wind Power Startup Has the Best Power to Weight Ratio?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bhaazee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sky
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on comparing two high altitude wind power startups, Makani and Sky Windpower, specifically focusing on their power to weight ratios. Participants explore the principles behind each design, the implications of their operational methods, and the challenges associated with high altitude wind energy generation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Makani's kite travels in a circular path, which may enhance its power to weight ratio compared to Sky Windpower's stationary design.
  • One participant questions the validity of determining power to weight ratios based solely on videos, emphasizing the need for empirical measurements.
  • Concerns are raised about the impact of the weight of the conductive wire used to return voltage to the ground on the overall performance of the kite systems.
  • Another participant highlights potential safety issues related to lightning strikes due to the conductive tether, referencing atmospheric electricity physics.
  • Some argue that the ability of Makani to achieve higher propeller RPMs could lead to better performance, while others express skepticism about the limitations of Sky Windpower's hovering requirement.
  • There is a discussion about the risks associated with tether failure and the potential for damage if the tether were to sever during operation.
  • Participants acknowledge that definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of these technologies may take several years of operational data to establish.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on which startup has the superior power to weight ratio, with multiple competing views and uncertainties remaining regarding the effectiveness and safety of both designs.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the reliance on theoretical principles and video demonstrations rather than empirical data, as well as unresolved questions about the safety and performance implications of the tether systems used in both designs.

bhaazee
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Hallo PF,
Both are startups working on high altitude wind power generation.

In general, both uses some sought of kite design to keep the generator afloat in air and the high velocity winds rotate the propellers of generators producing power. However, in Makani the kite travels along a circular path (replicates the tip of actual wind turbine's blade), whereas in Sky Windpower the kite stays STILL in air. I am trying to figure out which one of the two tops in terms of power to weight ratio(I think Makani's principle is solid enough).

concept Videos of both the companies are provided for your reference. It would be helpful if someone can help me with the above query

Sky Windpower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7hD_-mIokc&feature=player_embedded

Makani Power


Regards
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
"I am trying to figure out which one of the two tops in terms of power to weight ratio(I think Makani's principle is solid enough)."

How can you expect anyone to determine which one's power to weight ratio is "tops" given only two youtube videos? The answer must be found through measurement, not by gut feelings.
 
Interesting, I am curious about how the combined weight of the conductive wire returning the voltage to the ground impacts the flight.
 
bhaazee said:
Hallo PF,
Both are startups working on high altitude wind power generation.

In general, both uses some sought of kite design to keep the generator afloat in air and the high velocity winds rotate the propellers of generators producing power. However, in Makani the kite travels along a circular path (replicates the tip of actual wind turbine's blade), whereas in Sky Windpower the kite stays STILL in air. I am trying to figure out which one of the two tops in terms of power to weight ratio(I think Makani's principle is solid enough).

concept Videos of both the companies are provided for your reference. It would be helpful if someone can help me with the above query

Sky Windpower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7hD_-mIokc&feature=player_embedded

Makani Power


Regards


The new scheme for generating electrical power using kites with wind turbine generators seems promising. There is a danger, however, in sending any conductor (antenna) upwards in our atmosphere: there is a potential for attracting a lightning discharge even in clear weather, depending on conditions. Surely the kite generator experimenters must have accounted for this possibility.

For example: “The electrostatic potential gradient between the Earth and the Ionosphere is about 100Vm-1 near the surface in summer, rising to 300Vm-1 in winter. It is well known that electrostatic motors can be driven by the atmospheric electric field indefinitely from an appropriate antenna and Earth connection.”
http://www.meridian-int-res.com/Energy/Atmospheric.htm

For an overview of atmospheric electricity physics, see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_electricity

Finally, ninety years ago there were schemes to “harvest” this electrical potential. See:
http://www.nuenergy.org/alt/PlausonMarch1922.htm
http://www.nuenergy.org/alt/GernsbackOnPlausonFebruary1922.htm

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ofcourse. If accurate answers are required then actual measurements needs to be made. However, based on working principle I think Makani would provide the best power generated to weight ratio.

Coz,
the propeller rpm in makani compared to sky windpower is far greater (thnks to the circular flight path in makani). Also, in sky windpower since the device has to hover, I think this limits the unit size that can be built.

and regarding the tether, assuming the flight can reach heights of 600 m, what if the flight severes itself (bad wind or mechanical wear...) from tether. The flight can be landed safely. But is it possible for the tether to fall without causing any damage?

However, since the airborne wind power is something new, a conclusion regarding the effectiveness, problems, etc. can only be reached after 3 to 5 years of usage.
 
Thnx everyone for their suggestions and replies.

Regards
 

Similar threads

Replies
115
Views
31K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K