Which is a better preperation for grad work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eelbot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grad Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparative preparation for graduate studies in physics at the University of Toronto (UofT) and the University of Waterloo. Participants explore factors such as coursework, research opportunities, and overall educational experience, particularly in the context of pursuing theoretical physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the choice of university may depend more on personal learning styles than on the institutions themselves.
  • One participant humorously implies that the process of preparing for graduate studies can be frustrating and challenging.
  • Another participant notes that both UofT and Waterloo are reputable institutions that can adequately prepare students for a career in physics.
  • A participant with friends at both universities claims that the education received is largely similar, emphasizing that individual effort and external factors may play a more significant role than the university attended.
  • Concerns are raised about Waterloo's focus on preparing students for immediate employment through co-op programs, potentially at the expense of graduate school preparation.
  • UofT is mentioned to have a rigorous specialist program in physics, which some believe could be beneficial for graduate studies.
  • There is a suggestion that UofT may have better international connections, which could influence perceptions by foreign universities.
  • One participant advises caution regarding course selection in UofT's specialist program, highlighting the importance of managing course difficulty.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions, with some agreeing that both universities can provide a solid education, while others highlight specific advantages and disadvantages of each institution. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which university is definitively better for graduate preparation.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors such as curriculum similarities, teaching quality, and external opportunities that may influence the educational experience, but these aspects are not universally agreed upon and may depend on individual circumstances.

Eelbot
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I live in Canada and am going to university for physics next year. I am looking at University of Toronto, and the University of Waterloo. Currently, I would like to pursue a graduate education afterward. I am wondering which university would better prepare me through their coursework and undergraduate research options. I would like to study theoretical physics if that makes a difference in which university I should choose.
I like the look of Waterloo because they seem to be a top notch school for the physical sciences, however UofT seems to have a wider range of topics.

Basically, which would prepare me better for grad studies: UofToronto, or UofWaterloo?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's more about you and how you learn best than the school. This is one question you're going to have to answer yourself, I fear.
 
Eelbot said:
Basically, which would prepare me better for grad studies:
Find a wall, bang head against wall, repeat
As a treat eat ramen
 
NobodySpecial said:
Find a wall, bang head against wall, repeat
As a treat eat ramen

*hits head*

Am I doing it rite ?


@ OP
Either of these Universities would prepare you well for a career in physics. I believe it is up to you to prepare yourself for grad school.

Waterloo and UofT are both good universities; again, it is up to you to decide where you want to go.
 
Someone told me she didn't like working in a NL due to hassles from security concerns...
ie the atmosphere isn't as open.
Other experiences at NLs?
 
I'm currently in the Honours Physics program at Mcgill, but 3 of my best best friends are at the school you just mentioned (two are at UoT and one is at Waterloo). We talk several times a week, either by phone or by mails. From what I get from them, the education is pretty much the same. I seems to have gotten the best teachers, but at the end, we all learned the same things. We talked about it, and we pretty much had all the same curriculum (we all use Kleppner-Kolenkow, Griffith, Sakurai, Kittel, Hecht). From what we got, undergrad isn't very "school dependent", it's more about how you deal with it. We all agreed we should focus on the external factors (museums, libraries, nightlife and such)!
 
I have heard that it doesn't matter as well, and I am leaning towards Waterloo. However, I have heard that Waterloo doesn't try to prepare you for graduate programs, but instead tries to get you a job after school (co-op and such). UofT also apparently has good connections with oxford, which I am interested in...Does it still really matter? Will international universities look at me a bit better if I have a degree from UofT?
 
I don't know as much about Waterloo, but U of T has a specialist program in physics that will really work you hard (or at least they had it last time I was there, which admittedly was a few years ago, but surely it still exists). If you're into that, then check out U of T. Otherwise, it really doesn't matter where you go as you will get a good education anywhere, and in fact I argue that you'll get a better education at a smaller institution. You just have to figure out what you like (never an easy task IMO) and go with that. But generally speaking, all universities here will prepare you for grad school, although if a school has different streams, then you'll probably have to take the highest stream in your subject area (e.g. the specialist in physics at U of T).
 
What upper-level courses were available to you lurky?
 
  • #10
Why don't you have a look at this: http://www.artsandscience.utoronto.ca/ofr/calendar/prg_phy.htm

Note: If you go there, you'll probably be advised in first year to not take the specialist version of every course. Follow this advice. What they mean is, if you do the specialist program in physics and you take the two specialist first year courses (151&152), do not also take the specialist math courses (e.g. mat157). You'll note that they recommend the lower level math courses in the physics specialist program anyway. There's a reason for that and it's a very good one and it has to do with making sure that students actually come back for second year. Do not underestimate the difficulty level of these courses.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
676
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K