I Which machine learning model is best for detecting bottom quarks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dhananjay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detection Quark
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on selecting the appropriate machine learning model for detecting bottom quarks, particularly in the context of analyzing LHC data. Key considerations include understanding the characteristics of bottom quarks, such as their heavier mass and shorter lifespan compared to charm quarks, which can influence the choice of input parameters. The effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms depends on the specific details of the experiment and the study's objectives. Participants suggest consulting previous research and seeking guidance from supervisors to refine the approach. Ultimately, the choice of model and parameters is crucial for successful identification of bottom quarks in particle physics research.
Dhananjay
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
which machine learning model to use to detect bottom quark, and on what basis the segregation should be done
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

It looks like you've only posted a fragment of the question you want to ask. Can you provide more information on what you are asking?
 
I am working on a project:-
Machine learning for identifying B measons
I have LHC data for processing (data generated through pythia)
I am not able to understand which machine learning model to use
and since I am new to this, I don't know the characteristic of the bottom quark, through which I can separate the bottom quark from other particles
 
There are tons of options. Which one is best will depend on too many details to tell in general.
Dhananjay said:
and since I am new to this, I don't know the characteristic of the bottom quark, through which I can separate the bottom quark from other particles
Which input parameters to use is different from the question which machine learning algorithm to use. It depends on the experiment and the specific study you want to do.

The bottom quark is heavier but shorter-living than charm, which is typically the largest background, so variables will often focus on decay energies in one way or another.
Check previous publications and ask your supervisor or other contact in the experiment you work for.
 
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
646
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K