Which Method Correctly Ranks Zn, Fe, Cu, I^- from Strongest to Weakest Oxidant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Endorser
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around ranking the oxidizing strength of the elements Zn, Fe, Cu, and I^- from strongest to weakest oxidant. Participants explore various methods to determine this ranking, including the use of oxidation and reduction half-reaction tables, as well as standard potential tables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using an oxidation reaction table, proposing the order: Zn > Fe > Cu > I.
  • Another participant proposes using a reduction half-reaction table, listing the order as Zn > Cu > 2I^- > Fe^2+.
  • Some participants recommend checking standard potential tables to confirm the rankings.
  • A later reply questions the proposed order of Fe^2+, 2I^-, Cu, Zn, seeking confirmation on its correctness.
  • Participants discuss the importance of half-reactions and standard potentials in determining oxidizing strength, with some emphasizing the need for clarity on what happens to substances acting as oxidizers.
  • There are multiple references to the definitions of oxidation and reduction, with some participants reiterating the concepts of electron transfer and changes in oxidation states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct ranking of the substances as oxidants, with no consensus reached on which method or order is definitive. The discussion remains unresolved with competing perspectives on the appropriate approach to determine oxidizing strength.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the necessity of including standard potentials in their analysis, while others highlight the distinction between full and half-reactions. There is also mention of the importance of understanding the behavior of substances as oxidizers, but the discussion does not resolve these points.

Endorser
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hello All I have been given a question form my chem teacher asking to place the following; Zn, Fe, Cu, I^- in order from strongest to weakest oxidant.

I have attempted two methods to solve this question

1st using the oxidation reaction table which lists as follows:
Zn>Fe>Cu>I

2nd using reduction half-reaction table which lists as following:
Zn>Cu>2I^->Fe^2+

I am unsure what 1 to use so please help me

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Determine what element/substance is a strong oxidant?

I have the following elements Zn, I^-, Fe^3+, Cu and i would like to know how to place these in order from strongest to weakest oxidant.

Thanks
 


Check standard potential tables.
 


Borek said:
Check standard potential tables.

So is the correct answer; (strong to weak)

Fe^2+
2I^-
Cu
Zn

just want some confirmation on this

thanks
 
Moderator's note: two identical threads merged into one.
 
Please list half reactions in which each given substance behaves as an oxidizer and list standard potentials of these reactions.

--
 
Borek said:
Please list half reactions in which each given substance behaves as an oxidizer and list standard potentials of these reactions./QUOTE]

Full

Zn2+ (aq)| Zn(S) || Cu2+(aq) | Cu(S)
I2(aq) | l-(aq) ||Cu2+(aq) | Cu(S)
I2(aq) | l-(aq) || Fe3+(aq) | Fe2+(aq)
Zn2+ (aq)| Zn(S) || I2(aq) | l-(aq)
Zn2+ (aq)| Zn(S) || Fe3+(aq) | Fe2+(aq)
Fe3+(aq) | Fe2+(aq) || Cu2+(aq) | Cu(S)

Half

Oxidation
Zn(S) → Zn2+(aq) + 2e-

Cu(S) → Cu2+(aq) + 2e
2I-(aq) → I2(aq) + 2e-

Zn(S) → Zn2+(aq) + 2e-

Zn(S) → Zn2+(aq) + 2e-
Cu(S) → Cu2+(aq) + 2e

Reduction
Cu2+(aq) + 2e- → Cu(S)
I2(aq) + 2e- →2I-(aq)

Fe3+(aq) +e- →Fe2+(aq)

I2(aq) + 2e- →2I-(aq)

Fe3+(aq) +e- →Fe2+(aq)

Fe3+(aq) +e- →Fe2+(aq)
 
Seems to me like you have listed everything just in case, as you have no idea what to look for.

I asked for half reactions, so full reactions are ruled out.

When substance acts as an oxidant (or oxidizer), what does happen to it? Does it gain, or loses electrons?

Finally, you have listed reactions, but omitted potentials, which are the most important part when looking for the answer to your question.

--
methods
 
When substance acts as an oxidant (or oxidizer), what does happen to it? Does it gain, or loses electrons?

OXI RED

Oxidation is increase Reduction is decrease
 
  • #10
Redox reaction means transfer of electrons - that means one substance gains electrons, other loses them. That in turn means one substance gets reduced, while the other gets oxidized.

Now, what happens to the substance that acts as an oxidizer? If you don't know, try to analyze the situation. Imagine there two substances reacting, Ox, and Red.

Substance Ox acts as an oxidizer.

The other substance is oxidized - does it get, or lose electrons?

If so, what happened to the electrons of the Ox substance - did it get more, or lost some?

If so, was it reduced, or oxidized?

And please, try to answer these questions, and not evade the answer but saying something that is basically right but not related to the question, as you did twice already. It won't work with me.

--
 
  • #11
If so, was it reduced, or oxidized?


Zn -> Zn^2+ + 2e^-

thus is has oxidized as Oxidation is gain in electrons
 
  • #12
OXI RED - Oxidation is increase Reduction is decrease - in terms of oxidation number.

OIL RIG - Oxidation is Loss Reduction is Gain - in terms of electrons.
 
  • #13
Borek said:
OXI RED - Oxidation is increase Reduction is decrease - in terms of oxidation number.

OIL RIG - Oxidation is Loss Reduction is Gain - in terms of electrons.

ahhhh... i c

so
Zn -> Zn^2+ + 2e^-

would be reduction due to OIL RIG
 
  • #14
Yep. Now, go back and do as asked earlier.

--
methods
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K