Which of these codes do you think is the simplest

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on comparing three different Python code implementations for finding the largest of three numbers. The first code defines a procedure called biggest(x, y, z), while the second and third codes are user-generated variations. Participants agree that using a helper function, bigger(x, y), simplifies the process. The consensus is that defining a procedure without built-in functions is the goal, and utilizing variable arguments with *args can enhance flexibility in the biggest function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Python functions and syntax
  • Familiarity with conditional statements in Python
  • Knowledge of variable arguments using *args in Python
  • Basic understanding of performance considerations in algorithm design
NEXT STEPS
  • Implement a Python function using *args to find the maximum value among an arbitrary number of inputs
  • Explore performance comparisons between different algorithms for finding maximum values
  • Learn about Python's built-in functions and their performance implications
  • Study best practices for writing clean and efficient Python code
USEFUL FOR

Beginner Python developers, educators teaching programming concepts, and anyone interested in algorithm optimization and code simplicity.

doktorwho
Messages
181
Reaction score
6
Codes.JPG
Since i don't know how to write code here on forums i will upload a picture and explain what's it about.
In the picture there are three codes that define the same procedure of finding the biggest number out of three given. The first code in the picture is defining a procedure called ##biggest(x,y,z)## and my friend and i agree that its the simplest one but it defines a procedure that is used in the given procedure to help the calculation. The second code is made by me and the third by my friend. We're kinda arguing whose is simpler and more elegant to use xD, what do you think?
Codes.JPG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Technology news on Phys.org
I think if you only have 3 vars, it should be

biggest = max(max(x,y),z) or whatever construct is equivalent in whatever language you are using.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rx7man and doktorwho
phinds said:
I think if you only have 3 vars, it should be

biggest = max(max(x,y),z) or whatever construct is equivalent in whatever language you are using.
Yeah i agree :-D, but the goal is to define a procedure and not use any built in, we are both beginners so that's why. We're using python :-D
 
doktorwho said:
Yeah i agree :-D, but the goal is to define a procedure and not use any built in, we are both beginners so that's why. We're using python :-D
Then use your bigger() function, following the idea that @phinds gave.

doktorwho said:
Since i don't know how to write code here on forums i will upload a picture and explain what's it about.
Posting an image of your code isn't very helpful. If you have an error, we can't insert a comment in your code. It's best to copy and paste the code directly into the page here, surrounding it with code tags.

Just like this:
Python:
[code=python]
def bigger(x, y):
   if (x >= y):
      return x
   else:
      return y
[/code]
(Since I have two sets of code tags, the outer set is not being rendered by the browser, due to some alterations I made. The inner set is causing the Python code to be displayed with different colors. When you do this, just use one set of tags.
 
doktorwho said:
The second code is made by me and the third by my friend. We're kinda arguing whose is simpler and more elegant to use xD, what do you think?
Python:
def biggest(x,y,z) : return x if x > y and x > z else y if y > z else z
 
If you're writing a function to find the maximum of more than two numbers as an exercise then you might as well make it work for any number of numbers.

In Python if you put *args in a function's argument list then Python will collect all the extra arguments into a tuple called args that you can access and use in your function (more info here and elsewhere on the web). For example, this function simply prints all the arguments it is called with:
Python:
def print_args(*arguments):
  for arg in arguments:
    print(arg)
You could similarly write a biggest function that identifies and returns the biggest argument it is called with.

Python:
def biggest(number, *more_numbers):
  max_found = number
  for n in more_numbers:
    if n > max_found:
      max_found = n
  return max_found
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Use your bigger function to define your biggest function:
Python:
def biggest(x,y,z):
    return bigger(x,bigger(y,z))
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
Thanks i tried all and i think i like using the bigger function as i find it the simplest..:-)
 
doktorwho said:
Thanks i tried all and i think i like using the bigger function as i find it the simplest..:-)
Also note that instead of 'x == False' you can write 'not x'.
 
  • #10
Before I saw the Python label, I was thinking this (C):
#define biggest(x,y,z) ((x>y)?((x>z)?x:z):((y>z)?y:z))
 
  • #11
I prefer biggest2, based on a performance point of view. With 2 comparisons you get your answer.

With biggest you need at least 3 comparisons, worst case scenario 4 comparisons (+ a function call).

With biggest1, you need at least 4 comparisons, worst case scenario 8 comparisons, before getting an answer!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
8K