I Which one is Antares in this photo?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photo
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying Antares in a specific astrophotograph, highlighting that while the caption indicates the yellow star as Antares, there are two similar stars present. The visibility of the surrounding nebula is affected by its faintness compared to the brightness of the stars, and the image likely underwent digital enhancement to reveal fainter details. Antares is noted for its significant size, being about 12 times the mass of the Sun and 700 times its radius, which contributes to its instability and potential for a future supernova. The conversation also touches on the implications of a nearby supernova event, questioning how observers on Earth would react to a neutrino flash from such an event. Overall, the thread combines astrophysical insights with practical considerations regarding supernova detection.
swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rho_O...le:Antares_and_Rho_Ophiuchi_by_Adam_Block.jpg

The caption says it's the yellow one (false color), but there are 2 such yellow stars, one that is in a clear area, and one that has a cloud around it. Whenever I look (naked-eye) at Antares, I don't see a cloud, but I know that with a low level of resolution, the cloud would not appear to be occluding it.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This one: Antares_and_Rho_Ophiuchi_by_Adam_Block.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, swampwiz and russ_watters
It's not just the low resolution that keeps your eyes from seeing the cloud. It's that the cloud is much fainter than the star.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
...and no doubt this photo was taken with narrow-band filters that block the vast majority of the light from the stars while letting the light from the nebulae through. So that compresses the dynamic range.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
russ_watters said:
...and no doubt this photo was taken with narrow-band filters that block the vast majority of the light from the stars while letting the light from the nebulae through. So that compresses the dynamic range.
... AND whoever made the image almost certainly digitally altered the image, bringing out the fainter parts and equalizing things so that the brighter parts of the nebula weren't overexposed at the same time. We do it all the time in astrophotography (for those that don't know).
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, swampwiz and russ_watters
A fascinating star for those who don't know about it, its mass is about 12 times the Sun's but its radius is some 700 times larger than the Sun's, making it one of the largest stars you can see with the naked eye. This is what it looks like: https://www.space.com/37912-supergiant-star-antares-photos-video.html . That mass means it will eventually go supernova (perhaps pretty soon, actually, maybe even in our lifetime but it's always a long shot), but right now it is puffed out so much because it has some element undergoing fusion in a shell, which means it cannot regulate its fusion temperature the way core fusion can. Hence the fusion is at higher T and going rather nuts, and the only way it can regulate itself is if it lifts off weight. That is the purpose of its huge radius, it reduces the weight of the envelope and stabilizes the shell fusion rate. Since weight goes like mass squared divided by radius squared, the former is some 100 times the Sun, yet the latter is some 500,000 times the Sun, so the weight has been reduced by a factor in the thousands to stabilize its high temperature fusion compared to the core fusion in the Sun.
 
Last edited:
The effect is similar to the red giants, by the way, it's not just the red supergiants that do this.
 
If the neutrino detectors detect a powerful, nearby flash say, tonight, do we here on Earth have any clue whether to stare at Betelgeuse or Antares until the shock actually starts breaking out into the bottom of the photosphere?
How long would propagation of the shock take, and who would be notified of a neutrino flash like that?
 
Back
Top