Which one is Antares in this photo?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photo
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on identifying Antares in an astrophotograph of the Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex. Participants clarify that the yellow star in the image is Antares, which appears surrounded by a faint cloud due to the use of narrow-band filters that enhance nebula visibility while suppressing star brightness. Antares, a red supergiant star, has a mass approximately 12 times that of the Sun and a radius about 700 times larger, making it one of the largest visible stars. Its unstable fusion process may lead to a supernova event, potentially observable within a human lifetime.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of astrophotography techniques, particularly narrow-band filtering.
  • Knowledge of stellar classifications, specifically red supergiants.
  • Familiarity with stellar evolution and supernova mechanisms.
  • Basic concepts of light propagation and neutrino detection in astrophysics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research narrow-band imaging techniques in astrophotography.
  • Learn about the life cycle of red supergiant stars and their eventual supernova events.
  • Study the physics of stellar fusion and the impact of mass and radius on stability.
  • Investigate neutrino astronomy and the implications of detecting neutrino flashes from nearby stars.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, astrophotographers, students of stellar evolution, and anyone interested in the dynamics of supernova events and stellar lifecycles.

swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rho_O...le:Antares_and_Rho_Ophiuchi_by_Adam_Block.jpg

The caption says it's the yellow one (false color), but there are 2 such yellow stars, one that is in a clear area, and one that has a cloud around it. Whenever I look (naked-eye) at Antares, I don't see a cloud, but I know that with a low level of resolution, the cloud would not appear to be occluding it.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This one: Antares_and_Rho_Ophiuchi_by_Adam_Block.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, swampwiz and russ_watters
It's not just the low resolution that keeps your eyes from seeing the cloud. It's that the cloud is much fainter than the star.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
...and no doubt this photo was taken with narrow-band filters that block the vast majority of the light from the stars while letting the light from the nebulae through. So that compresses the dynamic range.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark
russ_watters said:
...and no doubt this photo was taken with narrow-band filters that block the vast majority of the light from the stars while letting the light from the nebulae through. So that compresses the dynamic range.
... AND whoever made the image almost certainly digitally altered the image, bringing out the fainter parts and equalizing things so that the brighter parts of the nebula weren't overexposed at the same time. We do it all the time in astrophotography (for those that don't know).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, swampwiz and russ_watters
A fascinating star for those who don't know about it, its mass is about 12 times the Sun's but its radius is some 700 times larger than the Sun's, making it one of the largest stars you can see with the naked eye. This is what it looks like: https://www.space.com/37912-supergiant-star-antares-photos-video.html . That mass means it will eventually go supernova (perhaps pretty soon, actually, maybe even in our lifetime but it's always a long shot), but right now it is puffed out so much because it has some element undergoing fusion in a shell, which means it cannot regulate its fusion temperature the way core fusion can. Hence the fusion is at higher T and going rather nuts, and the only way it can regulate itself is if it lifts off weight. That is the purpose of its huge radius, it reduces the weight of the envelope and stabilizes the shell fusion rate. Since weight goes like mass squared divided by radius squared, the former is some 100 times the Sun, yet the latter is some 500,000 times the Sun, so the weight has been reduced by a factor in the thousands to stabilize its high temperature fusion compared to the core fusion in the Sun.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith
The effect is similar to the red giants, by the way, it's not just the red supergiants that do this.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith
If the neutrino detectors detect a powerful, nearby flash say, tonight, do we here on Earth have any clue whether to stare at Betelgeuse or Antares until the shock actually starts breaking out into the bottom of the photosphere?
How long would propagation of the shock take, and who would be notified of a neutrino flash like that?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ken G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K