Which Product Won't Be Obtained in a Wurtz Reaction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter baldbrain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Reaction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Wurtz reaction and the identification of products that can be formed. Participants conclude that the major product will be (a), while (d) will not be obtained. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding free radical and ionic mechanisms, as well as the resonance stability of allyl radicals. A key resource shared includes a link to a Master Organic Chemistry article that explains the molecular orbitals of allyl ions and radicals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Wurtz reaction mechanisms
  • Knowledge of free radical and ionic mechanisms in organic chemistry
  • Familiarity with resonance structures and stability of radicals
  • Basic concepts of frontier molecular orbital theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mechanisms of the Wurtz reaction in detail
  • Learn about resonance structures of allyl radicals and ions
  • Explore frontier molecular orbital theory and its applications
  • Research the implications of radical stability in organic reactions
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of reaction mechanisms and radical stability in organic synthesis.

baldbrain
Messages
236
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement


Which one of the following products will not be obtained in the given Wurtz reaction?
IMG_20181130_195951.JPG

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, (a) will definitely be the major product. We know that this reaction may proceed by a free radical or an ionic mechanism. But what's that got to do with the C-14 shifting position inside the ring? Any help?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20181130_195951.JPG
    IMG_20181130_195951.JPG
    18.3 KB · Views: 900
Physics news on Phys.org
It might help to draw out the resonance structures of the radical/ionic intermediate.
 
TeethWhitener said:
It might help to draw out the resonance structures of the radical/ionic intermediate.
Well, won't that conversion require additional energy? Do we presume it is available?
IMG_20181130_204553.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20181130_204553.jpg
    IMG_20181130_204553.jpg
    24.8 KB · Views: 734
baldbrain said:
Well, won't that conversion require additional energy?
Why? Maybe draw the hydrogens explicitly.
 
TeethWhitener said:
Why? Maybe draw the hydrogens explicitly.
What difference does that make? Won't THIS ##\downarrow## require additional energy?
IMG_20181130_210412.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20181130_210412.jpg
    IMG_20181130_210412.jpg
    35.3 KB · Views: 686
baldbrain said:
Won't THIS ↓↓\downarrow require additional energy?
Google "allyl radical."
 
TeethWhitener said:
Google "allyl radical."
****, you're right...I keep forgetting that.
 
I don't know why, but I still don't have a keen eye spotting the allyl radical. Get me?
 
  • #10
You might remember I stumbled upon this 'allyl' thingy even in that "same SN1 & SN2 product" problem.
Anyway, Thanks again.:smile:
 
  • #11
baldbrain said:
I don't know why, but I still don't have a keen eye spotting the allyl radical.
It's not a bad idea to have the possibility of allylic resonance in the back of your mind whenever you see a double bond. Other than that, I'm not sure there are any tricks to remembering it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: baldbrain
  • #12
I forgot to mention that the answer would be (d). You might've already guessed that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TeethWhitener

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K