Which properties of the quantum are random?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the randomness of various properties of quantum systems, particularly photons. Participants explore which properties are inherently random and which are not, considering contexts such as preparation states and measurement outcomes. The conversation includes theoretical aspects and conceptual clarifications regarding quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that properties such as spin, position, and momentum of photons are random, while phase, polarization, and coherence are not.
  • Others argue that polarization is akin to spin and thus also subject to randomness.
  • It is suggested that the randomness of a property can depend on the context and the preparation of the quantum state, with examples like Fock and coherent states illustrating this point.
  • Participants discuss the implications of using polarizers and the probabilistic nature of photon transmission through them.
  • Some contributions highlight that the term "randomness" may reflect a lack of knowledge about the system rather than true randomness.
  • There are inquiries about the relationship between complementary observables and the ability to know certain properties with certainty.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the definition of photon number and phase in coherent states, emphasizing the complexities involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the randomness of specific properties, with no consensus reached on which properties are definitively random or not. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nature of randomness in quantum systems.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves nuanced technical arguments about quantum states, measurement, and the implications of decoherence, with various assumptions and definitions that are not universally agreed upon.

San K
Messages
905
Reaction score
1
Which properties of the photon/quantum are random?

Spin - Yes
Position (within the "range/orbital") - Yes
Momentum - Yes

Phase - No
Polarization - No
Coherence (derivative of phase) - No

Is the above correct? Please add the properties I missed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Polarization of a photon is essentially the same as as spin of a photon. In that sense, polarization is also "random", i.e. subject to probabilistic laws.

Phase of a single photon is not even measurable.
 
Demystifier said:
Polarization of a photon is essentially the same as as spin of a photon. In that sense, polarization is also "random", i.e. subject to probabilistic laws.

Phase of a single photon is not even measurable.

interesting...then why do we have left and right polarizers?

i mean the left polarizer would allow only left-photons to pass through...but if polarization is random then the left polarizers would keep changing?
 
San K said:
interesting...then why do we have left and right polarizers?

i mean the left polarizer would allow only left-photons to pass through...but if polarization is random then the left polarizers would keep changing?
But you can also have a photon in the vertical (or horizontal) polarization, which is a superposition of left and right polarization. If you transmit such a photon through a left polarizer, there is a 50% chance that it will pass. So, it's probabilistic too.
 
Just a point: You can't really say that a specific property is always random or not, it depends on the context, and how you have prepare a particular state. For example, a photon in a Fock state has a known photon number, but an unknown (random) phase, whereas a photon prepared in a coherent state may have a well known phase, but instead containing an unknown (random) number of photons.
 
Zarqon said:
Just a point: You can't really say that a specific property is always random or not, it depends on the context, and how you have prepare a particular state. For example, a photon in a Fock state has a known photon number, but an unknown (random) phase, whereas a photon prepared in a coherent state may have a well known phase, but instead containing an unknown (random) number of photons.

interesting. so the same property can be random/non-random depending upon the state?

i.e. can we lock/unlock the randomness, in properties, of a photon?
 
San K said:
interesting. so the same property can be random/non-random depending upon the state?

i.e. can we lock/unlock the randomness, in properties, of a photon?

Sure, all you need to know is all the eigenstates of a particles. But knowing two complimentary observables however, makes it an issue that ''randomness'' is a word which replaces a ''lack of knowledge'' on the system. Randomness is an illusion of our semantic attachment for the need to know everything.
 
Goldstone1 said:
Sure, all you need to know is all the eigenstates of a particles. But knowing two complimentary observables however, makes it an issue that ''randomness'' is a word which replaces a ''lack of knowledge'' on the system. Randomness is an illusion of our semantic attachment for the need to know everything.

I had similar ideas, subject to verification.

Goldstone1 said:
But knowing two complimentary observables

how? can you give an example/experiment where two complimentary observables were known?
 
San K said:
I had similar ideas, subject to verification.



how? can you give an example/experiment where two complimentary observables were known?

Well, you can only know one with great certainty, but the other becomes increasingly unknowable, which is what was meant by the post.
 
  • #10
That doesn't mean it is random though.

We seem to also use the radiation of ripe systems as a perfect example of random systems. I don't see why... 1) If there is a mechanism, then it isn't random 2) you can freeze the system using the zeno effect, then your system of radiating particles are completely knowable over large periods of time.
 
  • #11
Zarqon said:
Just a point: You can't really say that a specific property is always random or not, it depends on the context, and how you have prepare a particular state. For example, a photon in a Fock state has a known photon number, but an unknown (random) phase, whereas a photon prepared in a coherent state may have a well known phase, but instead containing an unknown (random) number of photons.

I did not understand the "photon number" part.

Zarqon said:
a photon prepared in a coherent state may have a well known phase, but instead containing an unknown (random) number of photons.

If we have two photons in a coherent state, don't we have a well know phase as well as a known number of photons (i.e. two)?
 
  • #12
To say it was random, you would need to explain a large part of decoherence physics.

[tex]|\psi> = \sum_i |i><i|\psi>[/tex]

would be our state of the system also knowing that the [tex]|i>[/tex]'s form the Einselection basis. If one says the initial state of the system was [tex]\epsilon[/tex], then one can make a before and after equation based on what has happened in it's evolution. In effect, a system can either loose information or gain information. If we are talking about radiative systems, giving off radiation, then the after equation

[tex]|A>= \sum_i |\epsilon_i><i| \psi>[/tex]

If one can ultimately know how strongly [tex]|i>|\epsilon>[/tex] evolves into [tex]\epsilon_i[/tex] is completely knowable, because there is nothing which dictates in the equations that it cannot be knowable.
 
  • #13
San K said:
I did not understand the "photon number" part.

photon number = number of photons

San K said:
If we have two photons in a coherent state, don't we have a well know phase as well as a known number of photons (i.e. two)?

A coherent state is per definition a superposition of photon number states. As soon as you have one well defined photon number, then it must also have an unknown phase, because you cannot even define a phase for only one photon number, since a phase is a relative concept.

Simple example:

A state with exactly two photons can be written |2>, and there is only one possibility. However, a state with randomly either 1 or 2 photons could be written in a infinite number of ways, for example, |1> + |2> or |1> - |2>. The latter ones are coherent states and the phase is the difference in sign between the individual photon number states.
 
  • #14
Zarqon said:
photon number = number of photons
A coherent state is per definition a superposition of photon number states. As soon as you have one well defined photon number, then it must also have an unknown phase, because you cannot even define a phase for only one photon number, since a phase is a relative concept.

Simple example:

A state with exactly two photons can be written |2>, and there is only one possibility. However, a state with randomly either 1 or 2 photons could be written in a infinite number of ways, for example, |1> + |2> or |1> - |2>. The latter ones are coherent states and the phase is the difference in sign between the individual photon number states.
well put, this and the previous post. thanks for info
 
  • #15
San K said:
well put, this and the previous post. thanks for info

But their post does not prove a true random system. No part of it actually says random, it says ''lack of knowledge''. This is a priori of the argument solicitated, but understand lack of knowledge is just a part of ignorance. No system is incomplete and beyond the reach of human evolution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K