Which Technique Will Shape the Future of Quantum Computing?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter meteor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poll Quantum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the future techniques of quantum computing, exploring various approaches and their potential effectiveness. Participants debate the viability of different quantum computing technologies, including liquid NMR, ion trap, and silicon NMR quantum computers, while also considering other emerging methods.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express optimism about the advancements in quantum computation, citing Shor's algorithm and its implications for cryptography.
  • There is a proposal that silicon quantum computers will utilize Josephson junctions and quantum dots for computation.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of liquid NMR quantum computers, with some arguing they may not surpass 10 qubits.
  • Others mention the potential of ion trap quantum computers and their historical development.
  • Questions are posed regarding the practical applications of quantum mechanics in quantum computing, with requests for simple examples of non-classical calculations.
  • Some participants assert that superconducting quantum computers have a promising future, while others question the relevance of NMR techniques in the current landscape.
  • There is a discussion about the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm as a potential example of quantum computation, though some participants express skepticism about the accessibility of such examples.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on which quantum computing technique will prevail. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the effectiveness and future of various quantum computing methods, particularly between liquid NMR, ion trap, and silicon-based approaches.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight the limitations of current quantum computing technologies, such as the challenges faced by liquid NMR quantum computers and the need for high-temperature superconductors in certain implementations. There are also unresolved questions about the practical mechanisms by which quantum computing leverages quantum mechanics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying quantum computing, researchers exploring different quantum technologies, and individuals curious about the future directions of quantum computation.

QC

  • NMR quantum computers

    Votes: 4 28.6%
  • ion trap quantum computers

    Votes: 6 42.9%
  • silicon quantum computers

    Votes: 1 7.1%
  • other

    Votes: 3 21.4%

  • Total voters
    14
meteor
Messages
937
Reaction score
0
quantum computers---the poll!

Come on! This is your opportunity to influence in the future
Quantum computation is advancing firmly, problems of the past have been solved thanks to Shor's code, and decoherence does not seem now such a big problem. What of these 3 techniques (or other) will be the used in the quantum computers of the future? Vote now! I will also appreciate some comments. The future of quantum computation depends on YOU

PS: In fact a silicon quantum computer is a kind of NMR quantum computer, but the fact that is made of a solid make it differs from other liquid NMR quantum computers. So the 4 options are (in this order):
1)liquid NMR quantum computers
2)ion trap quantum computers
3)silicon NMR quantum computers
4)other
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I still haven't seen a single (simple) example of how a quantum computer uses quantum mechanics to do anything useful. And it's not that I didn't ask. :cry:
 
salsero:
there are some quantum algorithms that surpass any of the capacities of classical algorithms, e.g.
Shor's algorithm for factorization of prime numbers: it can really break down the widely used RSA public key cryptosystem
Grover's algorithm: for searching a database
Simon's algorithm: for find periods of functions
 
They are going to use josephson's junctions on silicon. They will make quantum dots on islands, as they are, and use those for quantum computation.
 
They are going to use josephson's junctions on silicon. They will make quantum dots on islands, as they are, and use those for quantum computation.
Is this the type of quantum computer known as "quantum dot quantum computer"?
StealthC, you seem to know what you're talking about. Do you think that superconducting quantum computers do have a great future?
 
Quantum-optics computer is important too?
 
Quantum-optics computer is important too?
I heard that there's a proposal for a linear optical quantum computer, but not much info at google

It seems that liquid NMR QC, the first option of the poll, it's a dead end path, the experts say that they will not be ever be capable of surpass the implantation of more than 10 qubits. It seems that the fight will be between the second and third option. Ion trap Quantum computers were invented in 1995 by Peter Zoller and the spanish Ignacio Cirac. Silicon quantum computers were first proposed in 1998 by Bruce Kane.

There seems that there's some minor investigation in other device called Cavity QED quantum computer
 
Last edited:
meteor said:
salsero:
there are some quantum algorithms that surpass any of the capacities of classical algorithms, e.g.
Shor's algorithm for factorization of prime numbers: it can really break down the widely used RSA public key cryptosystem
Grover's algorithm: for searching a database
Simon's algorithm: for find periods of functions

Could you please give me a simple example of a mechanism in which the quantum nature of qubits is used to do any calculation in a non-classical way? (Please write it here.)

Thanks!
 
Re to salsero: Could you please give me a simple example of a mechanism in which the quantum nature of qubits is used to do any calculation in a non-classical way?
I understand QuantumComputer and Quantum Computations as computation with quantum bits-Qubits. I think it is very simplest to understand but not simple to do. I think that Quantum Computer is a ansamble of quantum objects which prepare in the same spin states. It is named as inicialization. Spin up is 0 and itraverse 1. Before measurement we do not know the states of any objects and can say that it is the superposition of 1 and 0. Psi=a|0>+b|1>. In addition the all Quantum Objects (Qubits) as it is you known has the property of of Non-Locality. It is means in some words that all quantum objets are correlated i.e. has the same spin state. Before measurement it is Psi for the same qubit. From this follow that the all qubits is not interaction but has quantum correlation or in other words it is parralel. Thats all. Than how to copmutate with this device? Every qubit has not two states only but superposition Psi. When we use any qubit for computation then it is change in the process of computation and it is change the all qubits because its parralel. When we have the task of looking for the something than every qubits is looking for and in the same time to change other qubits! I suppose that somebody think that Quantum Competer is secret program because I do not see open information about job in area of QC.
 
  • #10
Could you please give me a simple example of a mechanism in which the quantum nature of qubits is used to do any calculation in a non-classical way? (Please write it here.)

The simplest example to understand is the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm. Get the details here:

http://www.cs.caltech.edu/cbsss/2002/schedule/slides/bacon.pdf
 
  • #11
So I understand that there is no simple example. One cannot understand how quantum mechanics helps to the computation without considering details of some complicated algorithms...
 
  • #12
StealthC said:
They are going to use josephson's junctions on silicon. They will make quantum dots on islands, as they are, and use those for quantum computation.

What are those? I think I read somewhere that they needed high temperature superconductors to work...
 
  • #13
meteor said:
Do you think that superconducting quantum computers do have a great future?

Ohhh yes! Definitly.
 
  • #14
meteor said:
1)liquid NMR quantum computers
2)ion trap quantum computers
3)silicon NMR quantum computers

What do these different types do and how are they diffrent? What does NMR stand for?


 
  • #15
Relax! It's more easy than it seems!

NMR stands for Nuclear magnetic resonance. A liquid NMR QC is in fact a drop of some substance composed of a kind of molecule, so the number of atoms of each molecule of the substance that you are able to manipulate at the same time using NMR techniques gives the number of qubits of the computer. The record until today is a 7-qubit liquid NMR quantum computer
About the silicon quantum computer, aka Kane quantum computer because was discovered by Kane, you can find info here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kane_quantum_computer
The simplest example to understand is the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm
Interestingly, the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm was implemented last year in a ion trap quantum computer
http://quantum.fis.ucm.es/article.pl?sid=03/06/12/1553215&mode=thread
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
StealthC said:
They are going to use josephson's junctions on silicon. They will make quantum dots on islands, as they are, and use those for quantum computation.

No, superconductor-based approaches would probably use niobium or, most likely, aluminium.
 
  • #17
I don't know why NMR is even on there; it will never work past a few tens of qubits, and that's if they're lucky.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K