White Hole: What Is It & How Does It Differ from Black Hole?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsnoob12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hole White hole
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of white holes and their distinction from black holes, exploring theoretical implications and the existence of such entities within the framework of general relativity and astrophysics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the existence of white holes, suggesting they are not necessary in current theories outside of science fiction and theoretical astrophysics.
  • Another participant provides a basic definition of white holes, contrasting their function with black holes, while also asserting their non-existence.
  • A more technical perspective is offered, noting that in general relativity, for every solution to the field equations, there exists a time-reversed solution, which would be a white hole. However, this perspective emphasizes the improbability of their existence due to the required initial conditions and thermodynamic considerations.
  • Some participants express confusion or curiosity about the term "white hole," indicating a lack of familiarity with the concept prior to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the existence of white holes, with some asserting they do not exist while others discuss their theoretical implications without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in understanding the conditions under which white holes could theoretically exist, as well as the dependence on specific interpretations of general relativity and thermodynamics.

physicsnoob12
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
what is a white hole and how does it differ from a black hole?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no such thing - probably
Outside SF, a few cranks, and a bunch of theoretical astrophysicts there is no need for white holes in any current theory.

Of course it's big universe and stranger things have happened
 
ahh thank you someone was throwing the term around and i had no idea what it meant
 
A white hole and a black hole attach two locations in space-time, the black hole draws things inwards where as a white hole is were all of the material is excreted. But as stated, they are non-existent.
 
In general relativity for every solution to the field equations there exists a time reversal which also solves the field equations. Hence if black holes are solutions to the field equations so are their time reversal t--> -t. These solutions are called white holes.

The reason that we don't expect to see them in nature is because they would require very unlikely initial conditions(eg exploding matter close to a singularity). So by the second law of thermodynamics we can exclude their existence at large distances, large masses etc. However
one may expect that at very short distances with very few degrees of freedom they may contribute to the path integral in quantum gravity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K