Who First Described Wave Propagation Through Medium Disturbance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haibane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of wave propagation through a medium, specifically focusing on the interpretation of a statement regarding how disturbances move and create new sources of waves. The original poster seeks clarification on which principle or conjecture best describes this phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers various historical principles related to wave propagation, including Newton's conjecture, Einstein's hypothesis, Huygens' principle, Maxwell's proposal, and Faraday's paradox. They express uncertainty about the correct association of these concepts with the statement provided.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that Huygens' principle is the correct answer, pointing to specific wording in the original statement as evidence. The original poster acknowledges this input but expresses a desire for further confirmation due to the importance of accuracy in their coursework.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions that they have not found relevant information in their textbook, indicating a potential gap in their resources or understanding of the topic. There is also a reference to concerns about contradictions related to Huygens' principle, suggesting that some participants are exploring deeper implications of the concept.

Haibane
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Was performing the online "reading questions" for my Physics 2 course. And I came to this question.

"A wave is not a material thing but a disturbance moving through a medium. The way that it propagates is that every part of the medium it encounters begins to vibrate in time with the wave and therefore with the original cause of the disturbance. Each part of the medium which is set to vibrating thereby becomes a new source of the wave and new waves radiate outwards from it in all directions. This idea is known as:"

Now after reading through the chapter a few times, I've not been able to see the mention of any laws, or statements that really seem to match this.

Any idea on where I may find such information?



Homework Equations


Possible choices in this case.

Newton's conjecture
Einstein's hypothesis
Hyghen's principle
Maxwell's proposal
Faraday's paradox



The Attempt at a Solution



If I recall correctly. Einsteins hypothesis referred to the idea of the moving of electric, and magnetic fields in parralel. While Faraday's Paradox has to do with magnetism.

I'm thinking it may be Hyghen's principle as it refers to the idea of light radiating in all directions. But at least as read, it doesn't make any mention about the part which might refer to the idea of the object vibrating in synch and thus appearing to become the source of the waves being emitted.


Can I get some help with this, or at least be pointed in the right direction?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is indeed Huygens' Principle. The last sentence, viz., "Each part of the medium which is set to vibrating thereby becomes a new source of the wave and new waves radiate outwards from it in all directions," should convince you.
 
Okey, I thought so as I was thinking about it. But wanted to make sure I was not incorrect in this. Since every point counts in the class, hehe.

Thank you for your help :)
 
Last edited:
Unexplained contradiction/paradox?

Long ago I somewhere read, that Huygens principle implied an unexplained
contradiction: Obviously no part of the newborn sum of concentric waves
at wavefront go backwards toward original source. There are no "backward waves", as should be if Huygens principle was really true. :confused:

There are also some other "paradoxes" concerning wave propagation - but life becomes easier if not bothering this too much. Mostly issues for future
Nobel Prize winners to dwell into ? :cool:
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K