Why a Wise Cyclist Carries His Load on the Bicycle: Understanding Centre of Mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasoning behind why a cyclist would carry loads on their bicycle rather than on their back, specifically focusing on the implications for the center of mass and stability while riding.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the assumptions behind the cyclist's choice, questioning the distribution of weight and its effects on stability. Some inquire about the definition of a "wise cyclist" and the specifics of the load being carried.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights and raising questions about the assumptions involved. Some guidance is provided regarding the distribution of weight and its impact on stability, but no consensus has been reached on the underlying assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention their educational background, specifically referencing the AQA syllabus and the transition from AS to A2 level physics, which may influence their understanding of the topic.

QueenFisher
why is it that a wise cyclist carries his load in packs on his bicycle intead of on her back? this is a poor question because of an assumption it makes.

i understand that by carrying the load on the bicycle instead of on his back the cyclist lowers the ecntre of mass so that it is harder for her to fall over (and so safer), but i can't work out the assumption and I'm sure it's a really obvious one...any pointers??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, I don't know it's an interesting question. Nothing initally jumps out. Maybe somehting to do with the distribution of the packs on the bike? I;m just guessing here though! Just out of interest which syllibus are you following?
 
What is your definition of a wise cyclist? Tour de France level or commuter level?

How heavy of a pack, and how big? Does the cyclist need to access it easily while riding (like for food and drink)?
 
the question is only what i posted so i suppose the assumption can be deduced from it (except that i can't think of it!)

syllabus: AS level AQA
 
I do AQA, I'm now doing A2, it's a really interesting course. The only thing I can think of is it assumes the packs are distributed about the bike so as not to create any turning moments and de-stablise the bike.
 
meaning it's in equilibrium?

how difficult is the A level as copared to AS? I've looked at the syllabus and it looks a bit complicated
 
Yes.

A2 is less volume more detail. If you do Mechanics M2 you'll find the SHM, circular motion stuff easy. The wave stuff is fairly straight forward as is the gravitationaland electromagentic forces, the only thing I found difficult was the magnetic fields. The nuclear instability is also quite easy. We did the Applied physics optional module and its really interesting.
 
yeah I'm doing M2 at the mo (even though i won't take the exam til next year...) what's the applied physics module about? i think I'm going to be doing that
 
Bit of rotational dynamics - moments of inertia etc. Thermodynamics, 1st and 2nd laws, pressure volumes curves, adiabatic expansion, the internal combustion engine.
 
  • #10
oh yeah. lots to look forward to :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 140 ·
5
Replies
140
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K