Why are Concentrations Squared in Solubility Equilibrium Constants?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JFS321
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on understanding the reasoning behind the use of squared concentrations in solubility equilibrium constants, particularly in the context of chemical reactions and their rates. Participants explore the conceptual visualization of this aspect of physical chemistry.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why a stoichiometric value, such as 2Ag+, is represented as [Ag+]^2 in equilibrium constants, seeking a visualization of this concept.
  • Another participant suggests that the justification for this representation is complex and relates to the concept of chemical potential, noting that it is typically covered in physical chemistry textbooks rather than general chemistry.
  • A participant questions whether the concept should be intuitively visualizable, indicating a willingness to accept that it may not be straightforward.
  • Another participant draws a parallel between reaction rates and equilibrium constants, suggesting that if a reaction involving A and B is proportional to [A][B], then it should hold true even when A equals B.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the concept can be intuitively visualized, with some expressing uncertainty and others providing different perspectives on the reasoning behind the squared concentrations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of the justification for using squared concentrations, indicating that it may depend on advanced concepts like chemical potential, which may not be accessible to all participants.

JFS321
Messages
75
Reaction score
6
Hi all,

I'm trying to understand -- really visualize -- the concept of solubility equilibrium constants. But, I can't understand WHY a stoichiometric value, say 2Ag+, is written in an equilibrium constant as [Ag+]^2.

I understand that in a rate law, squaring the concentration makes sense because you may have data indicating that the rate of reaction has increased by a factor of 4.

But, I can't make the mental connection here for solubility equilibrium or any other equilibrium constant. Can anyone help me visualize? Thanks--
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The justification is quite involved, and proceeds from the concept of the chemical potential. Textbooks on physical chemistry (Levine, Atkins) work through it in full, but you probably won't find it in general chemistry textbooks.
 
So basically, this is not something that I should intuitively be able to visualize? I think I can put it to rest if that's the case...
 
If you think it's intuitive that a reaction that includes A+B gives a reaction rate proportional to [A], then when A happens to equal B you should be willing to believe it's still proportional to [A]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K