A Why are Euler's angles picked exactly that way?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter illidan4426
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles
AI Thread Summary
Euler's angles are defined by a specific sequence of rotations around the axes: first around the z-axis, then the x-axis, and finally the z-axis again. This particular order is crucial because it leads to a unique representation of orientation in three-dimensional space. Alternative sequences, such as rotating around the x-axis first, would result in different transformation equations and potentially ambiguous orientations. The choice of convention in parametrizing rotations is essential for consistency in applications like robotics and aerospace. Understanding these conventions is key to accurately describing motion and orientation in 3D systems.
illidan4426
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I'm wondering why exactly those angles are picked to describe the orientation of the rotating body.
So the Euler's angles are described like this:
xyz-x'y'z' (first rotation around z axis)
x'y'z'-x''y''z'' (second rotation around x')
x''y''z''-XYZ (third rotation around z'')
So I've been thought it goes like this, now I'm wondering why? Why exactly these angles and why this order? Why can't it go like this for example:
xyz-x'y'z' (rotate around x)
x'y'z'-x''y''z'' (rotate around y')
x''y''z''-XYZ (rotate around z'')
Can the motion be described this way? The equations of transformation of xyz-XYZ would be different for sure.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are all kinds of conventions around to parametrize the rotations. The Euler angles are just the most often used ones.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and topsquark
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Euler vs. Tait (steady precession vs... what?)
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Rotating plate thrown parallel to ground
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Understanding 3D Coordinate Rotations with Euler Angles
Replies
2
Views
2K
A Electric and magnetic field lines in a plane wave of finite extent
Replies
1
Views
1K
A Corresponding case of steady precession but for Tait-Bryan angles
Replies
1
Views
1K
I How can Euler angles be visualized using a polar plot?
Replies
1
Views
2K
3D Coordinate transformation and Euler Angles
Replies
4
Views
3K
A Are Tait and Euler angles a complete parametrization of 3D space?
Replies
7
Views
2K
A Can the orientation of a body be defined by Euler angles?
Replies
18
Views
2K
Angle between two orthogonal coordinate systems
Replies
16
Views
9K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top