triabva2003
- 1
- 0
Why giant stars are so low in density?
The discussion centers on the reasons why giant stars exhibit low density compared to main-sequence stars. It explores concepts related to stellar evolution, particularly the processes that lead to the expansion and structural changes in stars as they transition into the red giant phase.
Participants express differing views on the mechanisms behind the low density of giant stars, with some attributing it to the effects of gravity and fuel consumption, while others emphasize the roles of core temperature and shell fusion. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing explanations presented.
Limitations in the discussion include varying assumptions about the roles of gravity, core temperature, and fusion processes in determining the density of giant stars. The complexity of stellar evolution and the interplay between different layers of a star are acknowledged but not fully resolved.
triabva2003 said:Why giant stars are so low in density?
It has nothing to do with less gravity. The core becomes super heated in ancient stars - which means more pressure on the outer layers. Stars are in a continuos state of hydrostatic equilibrium - until the core temperature becomes too hot or cool to remain in gravitational balance.Radrook said:By the time they become giants they have burnt up a lot of their fuel and their outer layers have bloated due to less gravity. It doesn't mean that their cores aren't very dense though. It just means their average density is lower than main sequence stars which are still fusing hydrogen and have enough gravity to keep their outer layers compact..
Chronos said:It has nothing to do with less gravity. The core becomes super heated in ancient stars - which means more pressure on the outer layers. Stars are in a continuos state of hydrostatic equilibrium - until the core temperature becomes too hot or cool to remain in gravitational balance.