Why are some organs duplicated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter derek10
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evolutionary rationale behind the duplication of certain organs, specifically two lungs and two kidneys, while having singular organs like the liver and heart. Participants highlight that having two smaller organs may provide a survival advantage, allowing for redundancy in case of organ failure. The concept of bilateral symmetry is also mentioned as a significant factor in organ development. Comparative anatomy and physiology are essential for understanding these evolutionary adaptations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic human anatomy
  • Familiarity with evolutionary biology concepts
  • Knowledge of comparative anatomy
  • Awareness of organ function and redundancy in human physiology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Comparative Physiology" to understand organ function across species
  • Explore "Bilateral Symmetry in Evolution" for insights into anatomical development
  • Investigate "Organ Redundancy and Survival" to learn about the benefits of having duplicate organs
  • Read about "Human Organ Transplants" to understand the implications of organ donation and regeneration
USEFUL FOR

Biologists, medical students, evolutionary scientists, and anyone interested in human anatomy and evolutionary adaptations.

derek10
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Why do we have two lungs, two kidneys instead of one bigger one but one liver, heart, pancreas?
I can understand the ears and eyes' cases, to see in 3D and hear better but not in the lungs and kidneys ones
I've googled but couldn't find a definite answer to this.

Is it due to need for a "spare" organ upon failure? (even I don't know if you can live with one lung and the lack of a second heart)
Is it because two smaller lungs/kidney work better than a single bigger one?

Is there a explanation for this?
Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
Bilateral symmetry. A very common trait established in the deep past of life.
 
You can live with one lung, one kidney very well, they have donor surgeries now where they will take part of a person's liver to donate because the liver will regenerate, people even have lived with part of their brain removed (the brain in some instances rewired itself).

What Organs Can You Live Without?
http://www.livescience.com/27896-pope-one-lung-organs-you-can-live-without.html

Did you know that some people are born with their organs reversed? They are on the wrong side of the body.

http://health.howstuffworks.com/human-body/parts/reversal-of-organ.htm
 
DaveC426913 said:
That's a really disappointing article. It essentially says 'we developed two lungs because we need them to survive.'

Yes, however barring our modern technology two lungs may have allowed us to survive to have kids.
 
derek10 said:
Why do we have two lungs, two kidneys instead of one bigger one but one liver, heart, pancreas?
<snip>

I wasn't a fan of jedishrfu's article either, but your question only makes sense in terms of comparative anatomy and comparative physiology:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_physiology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_anatomy

Different organisms have evolved different approaches to solve the same problem (adaptation). I'm not expert enough to say much more than that.
 
Thank you for your replies and links
The human body is not perfectly bilateral simmetric. (usually) heart on left side, liver on the right, off center stomach, etc..
But two almost identical lungs, kidneys, one bladder at center, etc
Why is that?
Interesting the reversed organ placement, diagnostics would be so awkward (pains on the other side, surgery...)
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K