Why Are Some Phenomena Unsolved in Physics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jobsism
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of whether there are phenomena that cannot be approached or explained by the laws of physics. Participants explore examples of such phenomena, including turbulence and concepts like hypnotism, while considering the limits of scientific inquiry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that all phenomena can be explained by physics, questioning if any exist that cannot be approached by its laws.
  • Another participant suggests hypnotism as a potential phenomenon that may not be fully explainable by physics.
  • Some participants argue that current limitations in explaining phenomena like turbulence do not imply they are inherently unexplainable, suggesting that future advancements may provide solutions.
  • There is a viewpoint that science cannot address supernatural or paranormal explanations, which may lead to the perception that physics is limited.
  • A participant discusses the probabilistic nature of certain physical phenomena, such as radioactive decay and turbulence, emphasizing that unpredictability is a fundamental aspect of nature.
  • It is proposed that science can only study observable phenomena, and anything unobservable, like the soul or morality, lies outside its scope.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions, with some believing that all phenomena can eventually be approached by science, while others suggest that certain phenomena may remain beyond the reach of physical laws. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the existence of phenomena that cannot be explained by physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the nature of certain phenomena, such as the probabilistic interpretation in quantum mechanics and chaos theory, which may restrict the extent of scientific inquiry.

jobsism
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
Physics is Amazing!

I have been thinking a lot, and finally came to the conclusion that every phenomenon that i know of can be explained in terms of physics, and hence the title for the post! :D But, is there any phenomenon, anything at all that can't even be approached by the laws of physics? I am not talking about unsolved theorems, but phenomena like turbulence (although turbulence to some extent is explainable).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:bugeye: hypnotism? :bugeye:
 


Science aims to explain everything.

Don't confuse what we can't explain now with what we will never explain (due to its nature).

Turbulence eludes us at the moment, but there's no reason we can't solve it eventually. God on the other hand is something science won't touch with a barge pole.
 


Only time will tell that phenomenon which can't be approached with laws of physics.As for me,it is only that which God has allowed mankind to know that we should bother about.
 


oraclelive said:
Only time will tell that phenomenon which can't be approached with laws of physics.

There is no reason that any subject cannot be approached by science.

It is only when we, as humans, try to give supernatural / paranormal explanations that physics falls flat because it simply "can't" or more appropriately "doesn't want to got there".
 


Science has given us some interesting answers as to what it can and cannot do... Suppose you want to ask the question when a specific radioactive atom in your hand will decay. The best science can do is say "Well, it probably won't decay until this time and will almost certainly have decayed by this time." That's something fundamental.

Turbulence is a good example of something similar. No matter how well we can measure the initial conditions, our predictions will eventually be wrong because of the nonlinearities inherent in the system. That's a simple fact about nature.

Any physical phenomenon is by assumption observable, and science can seek to understand any observable phenomenon. How far we are able to take this inquiry is then limited by some fundamental aspects of nature (probabilistic interpretation of QM and chaos, for my two above examples). The only things we cannot hope to study are those which are unobservable, things like the soul, morality, or alternate universes (I use the word universe in the truest sense of the term -- anything we can or can ever interact with. Not to be confused with any notion of an alternate universe which may be somehow accessible).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 190 ·
7
Replies
190
Views
17K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K