What are the most important phenomena that the Standard Model can't explain?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the limitations of the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics, particularly regarding unexplained phenomena and tensions between experimental results and theoretical predictions. Key categories of unexplained phenomena include Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) issues, such as the behavior of hadrons and the precision of parton distribution functions (PDFs). Additionally, tensions exist in measurements like the muon g-2 anomaly and discrepancies in CKM matrix elements. The conversation highlights the need for new physics to address these unresolved issues, suggesting that breakthroughs may arise from understanding these unexplained effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) principles
  • Understanding of the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Feynman diagram calculations
  • Statistical significance in experimental physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced QCD calculations and their limitations
  • Explore the implications of the muon g-2 anomaly on particle physics
  • Investigate the significance of the CKM matrix in flavor physics
  • Study the potential existence and implications of the X17 boson
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in particle physics, and students interested in the limitations of the Standard Model and the search for new physics phenomena.

  • #31
ohwilleke said:
Research motivated by dark matter and dark energy phenomena observations and constraints
That was one of my main instincts. But it seems like in recent decades it hasn't been the main focus, why do you think that is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
AndreasC said:
That was one of my main instincts. But it seems like in recent decades it hasn't been the main focus, why do you think that is?

There are 34,672 papers at arVix that concern dark matter and those papers are found in almost every conceivably relevant subfield. It has definitely received a lot of attention. Astronomers have more to say than physicists in many other subfields, but I would strongly disagree that it hasn't been one of the main focuses in recent decades.

Indeed, as the LHC and prior successes of the SM have dried up other opportunities to discover new physics that still seemed possible a few decades ago, it has increasingly moved to center stage.

Of course, the latest new toy for physicists as a community, the LHC, is excellent for investigating the properties of the Higgs boson, and only a marginal improvement in searching for dark matter, so this and hadronic physics and lepton universality violations and a few anomalous experimental results there (most of which haven't panned out) have also taken up some of the spotlight, and there are only so many times that the public can get interested in null results from direct dark matter detection experiments or the like, even when those investigations produce lots of new scientific papers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AndreasC
  • #33
ohwilleke said:
Astronomers have more to say than physicists in many other subfields, but I would strongly disagree that it hasn't been one of the main focuses in recent decades.
Yes, I worded it poorly. While there is a lot of attention paid to dark matter, the impression I get (which may be wrong) is that it isn't the main focus of physicists working on advancing the foundations of physics and going beyond the standard model. At least that is the impression I had, but I'm not basing it on anything concrete . I guess it makes sense that things have shifted after all the null results.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K