Undergrad What are the most important phenomena that the Standard Model can't explain?

Click For Summary
The Standard Model of particle physics successfully explains most experimental results, but there are notable phenomena it cannot adequately address, particularly in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) related to hadronic physics. Issues include the unclear behavior of certain hadrons, the imprecision of QCD calculations, and unresolved tensions between experimental measurements and theoretical predictions, such as discrepancies in muon g-2 and neutrino lifetimes. While some anomalies have historically resolved with improved measurements and calculations, new potential discoveries, like the proposed X17 boson, suggest the possibility of new physics beyond the Standard Model. The community continues to explore these unexplained effects, indicating a path forward for future breakthroughs. Overall, the search for new physics remains an active and critical area of research.
  • #31
ohwilleke said:
Research motivated by dark matter and dark energy phenomena observations and constraints
That was one of my main instincts. But it seems like in recent decades it hasn't been the main focus, why do you think that is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
AndreasC said:
That was one of my main instincts. But it seems like in recent decades it hasn't been the main focus, why do you think that is?

There are 34,672 papers at arVix that concern dark matter and those papers are found in almost every conceivably relevant subfield. It has definitely received a lot of attention. Astronomers have more to say than physicists in many other subfields, but I would strongly disagree that it hasn't been one of the main focuses in recent decades.

Indeed, as the LHC and prior successes of the SM have dried up other opportunities to discover new physics that still seemed possible a few decades ago, it has increasingly moved to center stage.

Of course, the latest new toy for physicists as a community, the LHC, is excellent for investigating the properties of the Higgs boson, and only a marginal improvement in searching for dark matter, so this and hadronic physics and lepton universality violations and a few anomalous experimental results there (most of which haven't panned out) have also taken up some of the spotlight, and there are only so many times that the public can get interested in null results from direct dark matter detection experiments or the like, even when those investigations produce lots of new scientific papers.
 
  • Like
Likes AndreasC
  • #33
ohwilleke said:
Astronomers have more to say than physicists in many other subfields, but I would strongly disagree that it hasn't been one of the main focuses in recent decades.
Yes, I worded it poorly. While there is a lot of attention paid to dark matter, the impression I get (which may be wrong) is that it isn't the main focus of physicists working on advancing the foundations of physics and going beyond the standard model. At least that is the impression I had, but I'm not basing it on anything concrete . I guess it makes sense that things have shifted after all the null results.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
669
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K