MHB Why Are There No Real Solutions to the Equation \( |x^2 + 4x| = -12 \)?

mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Explain why there are no real numbers that satisfy the equation
$$|x^2 + 4x| = - 12$$
How is this done algebraically?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Explain why there are no real numbers that satisfy the equation

|x^2 + 4x| = - 12

because ...

$|\text{whatever}| \ge 0$

How is this done algebraically?

solve each case ...

case 1 ... $x^2+4x \ge 0 \implies x^2+4x+12 = 0$ ... recommend looking at the discriminant

case 2 ... $x^2+4x < 0 \implies -x^2-4x+12 = 0$ ... check the two real solutions in the original abs equation.
 
See attachment for my little outline.

View attachment 7492
 

Attachments

  • MathMagic171109_1.png
    MathMagic171109_1.png
    10.2 KB · Views: 124
Last edited by a moderator:
$|whatever| \ge 0 \implies |whatever| \nless 0$

... that's it.
 
Great. We now move on to the next topic.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top