Why Aren't Reaction Orders Always Integers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter george_ong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Reaction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the non-integer reaction orders observed in the iodine and persulfate ions clock reaction, which were determined to be approximately 1.2. It is established that while reaction orders are typically integers reflecting the reaction mechanism, deviations can occur due to experimental errors or complex mechanisms. Integral reaction orders are only guaranteed for elementary reactions, while more intricate mechanisms can lead to fractional orders. The participants emphasize the importance of deriving rate equations to understand the reaction dynamics fully.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of reaction mechanisms in chemistry
  • Familiarity with elementary reactions and their characteristics
  • Knowledge of rate equations and their derivation
  • Experience with experimental techniques in chemical kinetics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of rate equations for complex reactions
  • Research the iodine clock reaction and its mechanisms
  • Learn about the significance of reaction orders in chemical kinetics
  • Explore methods for minimizing experimental error in reaction rate measurements
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, researchers in chemical kinetics, and laboratory technicians involved in experimental design and analysis of reaction mechanisms.

george_ong
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have just done an experiment on the clock reaction between iodine and persulfate ions. Using my experiment result, I have determined that the reaction orders are about 1.2 with respect to both persulfate and iodine ions.

There is this question ' Explain why the reaction orders should be integers' in the exercise section of my lab manual which I am supposed to answer. Can anyone give me a reason why the reaction orders can be rounded off to the nearest integer?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not about rounding, in most cases reaction orders ARE integers. They reflect reaction mechanism.
 
Yes, often the reaction orders are integral and observed deviation is due to experimental error.

However integral reaction orders reflecting mechanism are necessarily true only for elementary reactions. That is when A -> B or A + B -> C (or C + D) is the mechanism , not just the overall result of a more complicated mechanism. For elementary mechanisms moreover, the reaction order is 1 or for each participant (or 2 if the reactants are reacting with themselves A + A -> A2).

But if the reaction mechanism is a series of steps (with or without back reaction in some of the steps) the overall result even though each step its first order may be a concentration dependence that is more complicated than simple first order. Which gives chemists one possibility or necessity for disentangling to resolve just what is the mechanism.

Then, guessing, what were the observations in this experiment? Was it just the time taken for the solution to suddenly change colour? If so the reciprocal of that time is not, or not self-evidently, the velocity of any reaction. It is the result of a moderately complex process , see e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iodine_clock_reaction

In principle you'd have to derive the rate equations for that reaction, solve (integrate) them, and then find time for [I2] to exceed a certain threshold level.

In principle. Maybe there are simplifications possible - look up the references in the link.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
24K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K