Why Can't My Windows XP Desktop Access Shared Folders on Ubuntu 10.04?

  • Thread starter Thread starter minger
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a networking issue where a Windows XP desktop (Desktop A) cannot access shared folders on a dual-boot machine (Desktop B) running Ubuntu 10.04 when it is booted into Linux. The user employs Samba for file sharing, and while Desktop A cannot access shares by name, it can do so via IP address. The issue appears to be related to the DNS client service on the Windows machine, which must be operational for name resolution in a mixed OS environment. The user is seeking a solution rather than a workaround, indicating a desire to resolve the underlying problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Samba file sharing on Ubuntu 10.04
  • Familiarity with Windows XP networking settings
  • Knowledge of DNS client service functionality in Windows
  • Basic troubleshooting skills for mixed operating system networks
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate Samba configuration files on Ubuntu 10.04 for potential misconfigurations
  • Learn how to check and configure the DNS client service on Windows XP
  • Explore network troubleshooting tools such as 'ping' and 'tracert' for diagnosing connectivity issues
  • Research static IP configuration on Ubuntu to ensure consistent network access
USEFUL FOR

Network administrators, home users with mixed operating systems, and anyone troubleshooting file sharing issues between Windows and Linux environments.

minger
Science Advisor
Messages
1,494
Reaction score
2
Hi guys, I am having a home-networking issue. It's something that's been around for a while and I'm really just now needed to get it fixed. Here's the lowdown:

I have three machines, desktop A with Windows XP, a Windows Vista laptop, and a desktop B which dual-boots Windows XP and Ubuntu 10.04. Both desktops have shared folders.

When desktop B is booted into Windows, everything seems to work OK.

However, when desktop B is booted into Linux, things are fishy. I am using Samba for the sharing. Desktop A cannot see nor access desktop B shares in any way. From desktop B I cannot "see" desktop A via Network Location, nor can I get the share via the computer name. However, I can access the share by IP address. i.e.:
//desktopA/Media - doesn't work
192.168.1.100/Media - works

This initially made me think there was some sort of problem with my hosts file. However, upon looking at it, it seems to be correct. Both desktop machines are using the same DNS servers and nameservers.

What is even more weird is that my laptop can see the linux box. If I open up Network Places, I can see both the windows and linux shares (I can't access the Samba shares, I still have some permissions debugging to do).

So, after realizing this, I figured that the DNS is probably OK. After all, my laptop is properly seeing the shares. So...simply put, I'm a little confused. If anyone has anything I might be able to try, I'd appreciate it. I suppose I could set a static IP on the linux box and just share the IP, but I'd rather fix the problem than just bandaging it.

Thanks,
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Check the DNS client service is running on the windows machine.
Without it you can't find a server by MS network name.

However MS uses a rather 'interesting' system for creating the equivalent of a name server on the network. It ranks OSes by professionalness and if they are all the same they vote and pick one at random.
 
The service is running. As I mentioned, while Desktop B can fully use Desktop A's shares while booted into Windows. From the laptop I can see Desktop A in the network as the computer name. It appears as if DNS is working properly on that machine.

Something else slightly weird is that from the laptop (WinVista) I can see the Samba shares, while the Windows XP box cannot. I mean, when Desktop B is in Windows, everything works fine, but in Ubuntu, things are screwy. Based on this, I should be able to conclude that it's the Linux distro causing the issues, but everything appears to be fine.

I'm just at a loss.
 
I am having a hell of a time finding a good all-in-one inkjet printer. I must have gone through 5 Canon, 2 HP, one Brother, one Epson and two 4 X 6 photo printers in the last 7 yrs. all have all sort of problems. I don't even know where to start anymore. my price range is $180-$400, not exactly the cheapest ones. Mainly it's for my wife which is not exactly good in tech. most of the problem is the printers kept changing the way it operate. Must be from auto update. I cannot turn off the...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 123 ·
5
Replies
123
Views
19K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
3K