MHB Why can't real numbers satisfy this absolute value equation?

AI Thread Summary
The absolute value equation |x^2 + 4x| = -12 has no solutions in real numbers because the absolute value is always non-negative, meaning it cannot equal a negative number. The lowest value of |x^2 + 4x| occurs at its vertex, which is also non-negative. For complex numbers, the absolute value is defined as the square root of the sum of the squares of the real and imaginary parts, which is also non-negative. Therefore, there are no real or complex solutions to the equation. The discussion emphasizes the fundamental property of absolute values being non-negative.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Explain, in your own words, why there are no real numbers that satisfy the absolute value equation | x^2 + 4x | = - 12.

Can we say there is no real number solution here? If so, is the answer then imaginary taught in some advanced math class?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There's no solution, real or otherwise. What's the lowest value $|x^2+4x|$ can have? After answering that, consider the RHS of the equation.
 
For x a real number, |x| is defined as "x is x is non-negative, -x if x is negative". From that it should be clear that |x| is never negative.

For x a complex number, written as a+ bi, |x| is $$\sqrt{a^2+ b^2}$$. That is also never negative.
 
Thank you. Someone told me that there complex solutions but that did not make sense. So, I decided to ask the real math guys. Thank you again.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top