Why are the values (-1.618, 0) and (0.618 ,0) solutions for this equation?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pairofstrings
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equation x² + x = 1 and the emergence of the values (-1.618, 0) and (0.618, 0) as solutions. Participants explore the implications of these solutions, their graphical representation, and connections to concepts such as the Fibonacci sequence and the golden ratio. The conversation includes both algebraic reasoning and graphical interpretations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for clarification on why the values (-1.618, 0) and (0.618, 0) emerge from the equation x² + x = 1.
  • Another participant suggests that the values are solutions to the equation and proposes plotting the graph of y = x² + x - 1 instead.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between the solutions and the golden ratio, noting that the polynomial x² + x - 1 is related to Fibonacci sequences.
  • There is mention of using the quadratic formula to find the roots of the equation, which yields the values in question.
  • Several participants express confusion about the nature of the graph, with some noting that the equation x² + x = 1 represents two points rather than a continuous curve.
  • One participant raises a question about the applicability of the quadratic formula to other types of equations, such as cubic equations.
  • There is a discussion about the need for additional techniques when analyzing equations and their graphs, particularly in relation to intersections and asymptotic behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the values (-1.618, 0) and (0.618, 0) are solutions to the equation, but there is disagreement and confusion regarding the graphical representation and the implications of these solutions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader connections to other equations and methods of solving them.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the graphical interpretation of the equation and the relationship between different types of equations. There are also limitations in understanding how to transition between equations and their graphical representations.

  • #31
Mark44 said:
This isn't a curve. The solution set consists of two points on the real number line.
I will be persnickety about the words that I use if they does not come as understandable.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
pairofstrings said:
I will be persnickety about the words that I use if they does not come as understandable.
It doesn't. Please start being careful about the words that you use.
 
  • #33
Formula for solving Quadratic Equations does not work for Cubic Equations. So, sad..
 
  • #34
pairofstrings said:
Formula for solving Quadratic Equations does not work for Cubic Equations. So, sad..
This should not come as a surprise.
 
  • #35
pairofstrings said:
Summary:: I am trying to graph a plot for a simple equation but I am unable to perform the logic.

The equation is x2 + x = 1; When I plot the values are (-1.618 , 0) and (0.618 , 0). Why are these numbers emerging from the equation? Can somebody help me with this?

Thanks in advance.
Would it perhaps help your understanding if you wrote: $$x^2+x-1=0\;?$$ Then solve the equation by completing the square: $$(x+\frac{1}{2})^2=\frac{5}{4}$$ etc. It should then be clear why you obtain the given solutions.

For plotting purposes you are solving simultaneously the pair of equations: $$y=x^2+x-1$$and $$y=0$$.

1641120072311.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
  • #37
jbriggs444 said:
Do you recognize the golden ratio there? The limiting ratio between successive terms of the Fibonacci sequence is the Golden ratio, 1.61803... to 1. The ratio is sometimes referred to as phi (##\phi##)

The polynomial that you are looking at, ##x^2 + x - 1## is the characteristic polynomial for a similar sequence given by ##x_{n+2} = x_{n} - x_{n+1}## which is basically the reverse of the Fibonacci sequence.

Obviously, if you start a Fibonnacci sequence with 0.61803... and 1, the next term will be 1.61803... You may have noticed that ##1.61803... = \frac{1}{0.61803...}##. The ratio of consecutive terms in this particular sequence is always a constant equal to ##\phi##.

As I recall, if you solve the Fibonacci recurrence you will get some linear combination ## k_1 \phi^n + k_2 (-\phi)^{-n}##. For almost any first two terms you use, the limiting ratio of consecutive elements in the resulting sequence will be either ##\phi## or ##-\phi## in both directions.

If you are interested, we can walk through the details of recurrence relations and the methods for solving them.

You could also just use the quadratic formula, ##\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}## on your polynomial: ##x^2 + x - 1## (a = 1, b = 1, c = -1) to get roots of ##\frac{\sqrt{5}-1}{2}## = ##\frac{1}{\phi}## = 0.61803... and ##\frac{-\sqrt{5} - 1}{2}## = ##-\phi## = -1.61803...
That is pretty interesting!

Edit: the Fibonacci part.
 
  • #38
neilparker62 said:
solve the equation by completing the square
I understand that 'completing the square' is a technique that solves equations like ##x^2+x-1=0##. There are many equations with higher exponents, and lower exponents, and to solve them there could be techniques that gives me solutions by satisfying those equations. The 'completing the square' is one such technique for what I mentioned above..

My question is: how to draw such techniques in math, and where to find other such techniques in math. Also if you could, can you please list techniques that forms solution to various other equations here?
 
Last edited:
  • #39
pairofstrings said:
I understand that 'completing the square' is a technique that solves equations like ##x^2+x-1=0##. There are many equations with higher exponents, and lower exponents, and to solve them there could be techniques that gives me solutions by satisfying those equations. The 'completing the square' is one such technique for what I mentioned above..

My question is: how to draw such techniques in math, and where to find other such techniques in math. Also if you could, can you please list techniques that forms solution to various other equations here?
"How do you solve equations in math?" is a pretty broad question. One answer is that you take a math course.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and Mark44
  • #40
pairofstrings said:
I understand that 'completing the square' is a technique that solves equations like ##x^2+x-1=0##. There are many equations with higher exponents, and lower exponents, and to solve them there could be techniques that gives me solutions by satisfying those equations.
The Quadratic Formula could also be used to solve this quadratic equation. The Quadratic Formula can be proved using the method of completing the square.

The advice below from @jbriggs444 is very good, especially given your disappointment that the Quadratic Formula could not be used to solve cubic equations.
jbriggs444 said:
One answer is that you take a math course.
 
  • #41
Perhaps OP was referring to solving an equation by graphical methods. That is to say, solving ##f(x) = g(x)## by graphing ##y=f(x)## and ##y=g(x)## on the same set of axes, then using the intersections as the solutions.
For this thread, that means graph ##y=x^2+x## and ##y=1##, as in the following.

Graphical Solution PairOfStrings.png
 
  • #42
jbriggs444 said:
"How do you solve equations in math?" is a pretty broad question. One answer is that you take a math course.
Deserves a mention on the "one liners" thread.
 
  • #43
One of the members asked a question of @pairofstrings which was not yet answered.
"Do you understand basic algebra"? and "What grade are you in?"

I also ask, exactly which courses have you formally studied in Mathematics up to now, including the course you are currently in?
 
  • #44
pairofstrings said:
Summary:: I am trying to graph a plot for a simple equation but I am unable to perform the logic.

The equation is x2 + x = 1; When I plot the values are (-1.618 , 0) and (0.618 , 0). Why are these numbers emerging from the equation? Can somebody help me with this?

Thanks in advance.
This is one-dimensional only, as written. The level of instruction and course would be Intermediate Algebra.

Review Completing-the-Square from whatever material you have. The value to complete the square is (1/(2*1))^2=1/4.

I will use(mostly) plain text here. You can transcribe it if that helps.

x2+x=1
x2+x+1/4=1+1/4
(x+1/2)2=5/4
x+1/2=+-(1/2)sqrt(5)
x=-1/2+-(1/2)sqrt(5)
x=(-1+-sqrt(5))/2 -----------this is two different values, each of which satisfies the original equation. You can use a decimal approximation for square root of five and find the corresponding x values for your solution.
 
Last edited:
  • #45
Thank you all for the answers. I figured out how to build equations. Thanks for the support!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
835
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K