Why can't we name this compound as 4-ethyl-5-methyloctane?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
physicsmaths1613
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
5-ethyl-4-methyloctane. Why can't we name this compound as
4-ethyl-5-methyloctane?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Practically, it makes no difference. Any chemist would know what molecule you're referring to. Technically (and I mean that in the worst possible way) the correct name according to IUPAC rules is 4-ethyl-5-methyloctane, because "ethyl" comes before "methyl" alphabetically, so "ethyl" gets a lower number assigned to it than "methyl".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physicsmaths1613