Why did Matter Beat Out Anitmatter?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Phrak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the imbalance between matter and antimatter in the universe, questioning why matter prevailed after the Big Bang. Observations indicate that approximately 1 in 10,000 particles of matter remain, while antimatter has been nearly entirely annihilated. Theories surrounding this phenomenon are still under exploration, with recent references to meson B particles as potential explanations. No definitive theorem has been established to clarify this imbalance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Big Bang theory
  • Basic knowledge of particle physics
  • Familiarity with meson B particles
  • Concept of particle-antiparticle annihilation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of meson B particles in particle physics
  • Explore theories regarding baryogenesis
  • Study the implications of quantum numbers in particle interactions
  • Investigate current experiments in antimatter production and detection
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the fundamental questions of the universe's composition and the nature of matter and antimatter.

Phrak
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
7
"Why did Matter Beat Out Anitmatter?"

"Why did Matter Beat Out Anitmatter?," reads the article title listed in the sidebar on the righthand side of the window.

What does this even mean? I suspect that 'matter' and 'antimatter' are arbitrary labels. If this is correct, what is apparently imbalanced in the Universe?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Due to rules of equlibirum in the universe it would be logical to suspect that after Big Bang there was 50% of matter and 50% of antimatter. If that were true, the matter and antimatter would anihilate with each other and turn into energy. However, obsevration of the universe shows that 1/10.000 of matter remained while the antimatter was almost all destroyed. Many scientist are asking themselfs why this is so. No definitive theorem is yet to be accepted. I read an article about a weak ago in which they were trying to explain this matter with meson B particles.
 
Is there a matter quantum numbr?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 264 ·
9
Replies
264
Views
24K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
12K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K