Why Did the Romans Neglect Mathematics for a Millennium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oahz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the apparent lack of mathematical development in Roman society over a millennium, exploring historical, cultural, and practical perspectives. Participants examine the implications of Roman numeral systems, engineering practices, and the influence of Greek mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Romans did not require advanced mathematics for practical tasks like building aqueducts.
  • Others argue that the Roman numeral system was inefficient for calculations, complicating mathematical operations.
  • A few participants note that the Greek mathematical tradition continued to influence thought during the Roman period, despite Roman dominance.
  • There is a mention of the cultural differences between Greeks and Romans, with Romans being more focused on practical achievements rather than theoretical mathematics.
  • Some express skepticism about the Romans' understanding of concepts like mass and weight, suggesting a lack of precision in their measurements.
  • Participants discuss the potential reliance on Greek mathematicians for engineering tasks, indicating a division of labor based on expertise.
  • There are varying opinions on the effectiveness of the Roman numeral system compared to the Greek system, with some claiming it was better for conceptual thinking but poor for practical writing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the reasons for the perceived neglect of mathematics in Roman culture, and the discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the underlying causes.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the unclear definitions of mathematical concepts in Roman society, the dependence on cultural context for understanding mathematical practices, and unresolved questions about the efficiency of Roman numeral calculations.

oahz
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
1000 years of mathlessness.

what gives?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
oahz said:
1000 years of mathlessness.

what gives?

please explain
 
I suppose if they had to build stuff, like aqueducts, they don't really need maths. Like none whatsoever :rolleyes:
 
wukunlin said:
I suppose if they had to build stuff, like aqueducts, they don't really need maths. Like none whatsoever :rolleyes:

Because theory always precedes practice, right?
 
goingmeta said:
Because theory always precedes practice, right?

and who uses maths in practice?
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
please explain

i know of no math theory attributed to a roman
 
Have you ever tried multiplication with Roman numerals?
 
They probs just used algebra and abicusses.
 
I assume the OP is referring to the fact that the Greeks basically crushed geometry, then got crushed by the Romans, then we have to wait for a whole new religion in Islam to pop up just to figure out what algebra is. I assume it's a combination of the Roman numeral system being just about the worst in the world and the difference in cultures between Greeks and Romans
 
  • #10
Roman contributions to math.

http://accessscience.com/studycenter.aspx?main=17&questionID=5798
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
collinsmark said:
Have you ever tried multiplication with Roman numerals?

Try this: (MMDCCXLVII)*(MMCCCXCIV)

They were good at speaking Latin, conquest, building by over-engineering because they couldn't calculate, passing laws, and throwing great parties (not so great if you were a slave)

The Greek math tradition continued at Alexandria during the Roman period.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
wukunlin said:
I didn't know its possible, then I did some googling:
http://www.jimloy.com/arith/roman.htm
http://www.jimloy.com/arith/division.htm

I think I have enough headache for today

And fractions. I'm lead to believe that there wasn't a standard way to represent fractions using the Roman numeral system with more precision that 1/12 (they had some sort of representation for divisions by 12, but I don't know much about that).

I wonder what a fairly precise representation of \pi would look like in the Roman numeral system (something quite a bit more more accurate than III).
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Office_Shredder said:
I assume the OP is referring to the fact that the Greeks basically crushed geometry, then got crushed by the Romans, then we have to wait for a whole new religion in Islam to pop up just to figure out what algebra is. I assume it's a combination of the Roman numeral system being just about the worst in the world and the difference in cultures between Greeks and Romans

My thought, too -- what a terrible numeral system. Notation is powerful!
 
  • #15
The Romans and Greeks had very different notions of leisure, notions that defined a good part of their cultures. The former was dominated by hedonism whereas the latter was focused a good deal on natural philosophy, amongst other things.
 
  • #16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExWfh6sGyso
 
  • #17
Haha, classic Python!
 
  • #20
edward said:
The Romans had some unusual units of measurement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Roman_units_of_measurement.

My favorite quote from that page is
The units of weight (in the everyday sense of the word; technically, "mass"

I find it hard to believe that the Romans had a well-defined sense of the difference between mass and weight, and that their units were defined to be in terms of mass, not weight.
 
  • #21
Yet they made incredible concrete and aqueducts that ran for miles across mountainous, uneven terrain, indoor plumbing, incredible systems for hot and cold baths, running toilets. And they were pretty damned remarkable. They created roads that are still in use today. The colosseum had retractable roofs and elevators. A system to flood the bottom to create a sea for indoor water warfare. Their architectural and engineering accomplishments were astonishing.
 
  • #22
One of the prof in my department once said light travels a foot per second. When someone asked how long a foot is (not uncommon here for students who've been taught metric system is the only thing we ever need to know), his reply was "actually, to be precise I meant a Roman foot."
 
  • #23
Evo said:
Yet they made incredible concrete and aqueducts that ran for miles across mountainous, uneven terrain, indoor plumbing, incredible systems for hot and cold baths, running toilets. And they were pretty damned remarkable. They created roads that are still in use today. The colosseum had retractable roofs and elevators. A system to flood the bottom to create a sea for indoor water warfare. Their architectural and engineering accomplishments were astonishing.

I've always wanted to visit Rome to see the remnants of some of the brilliant structures that they've left behind.
 
  • #24
Evo said:
Yet they made incredible concrete and aqueducts that ran for miles across mountainous, uneven terrain, indoor plumbing, incredible systems for hot and cold baths, running toilets. And they were pretty damned remarkable. They created roads that are still in use today. The colosseum had retractable roofs and elevators. A system to flood the bottom to create a sea for indoor water warfare. Their architectural and engineering accomplishments were astonishing.
It's likely that when they needed something engineered they hired or impressed Greek mathematicians. Something I found out recently is that the Roman Army had very few Romans in it. It was mostly made up of foreign troops from conquered countries who were included because of their dedicated strengths; archers from one nation, charioteers from another, etc. The Roman genius seems to have consisted of organizing other people with various specific skills.
 
  • #25
AnTiFreeze3 said:
I've always wanted to visit Rome to see the remnants of some of the brilliant structures that they've left behind.

I too want to visit Rome, and see the original Little Caesar's Pizza store, originally
called "Et tu, Pizza".

I remember how I used to piss-off my Highschool history prof. by talking about Italy when referring to Rome. No matter how many times she told me Italy became a state sometime , I think in the 1800's, ( I wasn't listening much here either) I would keep referring to Italy. I wasn't too good in the area of paying attention.
 
  • #26
zoobyshoe said:
It's likely that when they needed something engineered they hired or impressed Greek mathematicians.
Vitruvius would probably mince you in one of his screwpumps for saying that.
 
  • #27
lisab said:
My thought, too -- what a terrible numeral system. Notation is powerful!

Is the Roman numeral system worse than the Greek numeral system?

greek-table.gif


To write 333, you'd write:

\tau \lambda \gamma

Worse yet, whenever I tried to find a party at a fraternity house, the addresses on the houses weren't even in alphabetic order. They just seemed to number them at random!

The Roman numeral system is actually a great system for thinking about numbers. It's just a lousy system for writing numbers. If a person didn't know the concept of Roman numerals, they wouldn't be able to count all the way up to 99 on their fingers. They couldn't count beyond a measly 9!


zoobyshoe said:
It's likely that when they needed something engineered they hired or impressed Greek mathematicians. Something I found out recently is that the Roman Army had very few Romans in it. It was mostly made up of foreign troops from conquered countries who were included because of their dedicated strengths; archers from one nation, charioteers from another, etc. The Roman genius seems to have consisted of organizing other people with various specific skills.

Just because they didn't invent any new math theories doesn't necessarily mean they didn't learn some of the things the Greeks and Babylonians came up with. I can sympathize with the Romans. I haven't come up with any new math theories at all, but at least I've learned a few of the principles other, smarter people have developed.
 
  • #28
Hey Caligula, where's that LCXVIII bucks you owe me, dude!
 
  • #29
wukunlin said:
One of the prof in my department once said light travels a foot per second. When someone asked how long a foot is (not uncommon here for students who've been taught metric system is the only thing we ever need to know), his reply was "actually, to be precise I meant a Roman foot."

You mean a foot per nanosecond? Otherwise he must have been an engineer...
 
  • #30
dipole said:
You mean a foot per nanosecond? Otherwise he must have been an engineer...

I think you missed the joke.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K