Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of actors becoming presidents, particularly in the context of U.S. politics. Participants explore the reasons behind this trend, questioning the apparent contradiction of conservative voters supporting actors from liberal backgrounds.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
Main Points Raised
- Some participants question why conservatives, who often criticize liberal Hollywood, still support actors as presidential candidates.
- One participant suggests that the choice of actors is a Machiavellian decision, as actors can be persuasive figures.
- Another viewpoint posits that not all actors are viewed negatively; for instance, Arnold Schwarzenegger is cited as a conservative figure who could potentially win a national election.
- There is a discussion about the socioeconomic backgrounds of wealthy individuals, with some arguing that those who earned their wealth tend to be more conservative compared to those who inherited it.
- Several posts express frustration over the lack of direct answers to the initial question, emphasizing the thread's focus on asking "why" rather than providing solutions.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on the reasons behind the trend of actors becoming presidents. Some agree on the persuasive nature of actors, while others challenge the assumptions about political affiliations and motivations.
Contextual Notes
The discussion includes various tangential topics, such as beliefs about religion and societal perceptions, which may influence the perspectives shared regarding actors in politics.