Why Do Antimatter and Matter Annihilate When They Collide?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Helical
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Antimatter and matter annihilate upon collision due to the principles of quantum mechanics and special relativity, as established by physicist Paul Dirac. This annihilation results in the production of high-energy photons or Z bosons when an electron and its antiparticle, the positron, interact. The fundamental nature of these interactions is dictated by the formalism of quantum field theory, which necessitates the existence of antiparticles. Consequently, the annihilation process is a well-observed phenomenon in particle physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics principles
  • Special relativity concepts
  • Understanding of particle-antiparticle interactions
  • Feynman's space-time diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Dirac's equation and its implications for antimatter
  • Explore quantum field theory and its role in particle physics
  • Learn about photon production in particle collisions
  • Investigate the properties of Z bosons and their interactions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental interactions of matter and antimatter in the universe.

Helical
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Why do antimatter and matter annihilate when they collide?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's what physicists would like to know. The short answer is "Thems the rules", i.e. that's the way Nature is. We know that anti-matter and matter annihilate because we observe that they do. And we observe the opposite, the a high energy photon (E >= 1.022 MeV) may interact with a nucleus (nuclear field) to produce a positron/electron pair.

Why it happens is one of those fundamental (and mostly philosophical) questions.
 
Anything that can happen will happen.
 
Helical said:
Why do antimatter and matter annihilate when they collide?

Generally speaking, many physicists do not answer questions starting by "Why"...
 
Why not?
 
I think there should be a finite cross section for such an annihilation.
And the total additive quantum number is Zero, so it can happen.
 
Barmecides said:
Generally speaking, many physicists do not answer questions starting by "Why"...
clem said:
Why not?

LOL. Not being a physicist myself I can respond to that. (Though you probably weren't entirely serious, I kind of feel as though this might be the place for a “Why did the physicist cross the road?” joke.)

I think it's probably because at a certain level, responses to questions that demand conceptual answers cannot be made without making unverified claims or generalizations. In that case the guaranteed-accurate and safest way to avoid misstating things is to essentially only provide data in response to questions.
 
Helical said:
Why do antimatter and matter annihilate when they collide?

Actually, it is a consequence opf marrying quantum mechanics with special relativity. When you do that (or, when dirac did that I should say) you have no choice than to introduce the concept of antiparticles. It is forced upon you by the formalism. And then, once you couple the electron (and its antiparticle) to an electromagnetic field, you have no choice than to accept that an electron and a positron will annihilate into photons. When you couple them to the weak gauge bosons, you find that they will also annihilate into Z bosons.

So if you accept quantum mechanics and special relativity, annihilation is forced upon you.
 
I would rather agree with kdv's answer, especially considering that Dirac's prediction of antimatter is probably one of the most spectacular ever. And in Feynman's space-time picture this becomes quite trivial.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K