Why Do Engineering Associations and Registries Exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dijkarte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    cpu Home
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of self-taught individuals entering the field of electrical engineering, particularly in comparison to the software industry. Participants explore the challenges and possibilities of learning engineering concepts independently, the role of formal education, and the existence of engineering associations and registries.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that obtaining a job as an Electrical Engineer without a degree is nearly impossible, while others suggest that a degree in Computer Science combined with some EE courses might suffice.
  • There is a belief among some that self-taught individuals can succeed in software engineering, but this is contested when applied to hardware engineering.
  • One participant emphasizes the high-tech nature of computer chip design, suggesting that it cannot be done at home, while another counters that building a primitive CPU could be feasible as a project.
  • Discussion includes the idea that advances in software allow for experimentation in electronics without traditional laboratory setups.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the practicality and worth of building CPUs at home, while others defend the concept as a valid engineering endeavor.
  • There are humorous and speculative comments about hypothetical processors, which some participants feel detract from the main topic.
  • A participant questions the assertion that 3D computer graphics is akin to nuclear physics, seeking clarification on this claim.
  • Concerns are raised about the role and necessity of engineering associations and registries, with a request for further explanation of their purpose.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the viability of self-taught engineering, with no consensus on whether it is feasible or practical. The discussion also reflects differing opinions on the relevance and necessity of engineering associations and registries.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various assumptions about the nature of engineering education and the capabilities of self-taught individuals, but these assumptions are not universally accepted. The discussion also touches on the complexity of topics like computer chip design and the varying definitions of what constitutes engineering work.

dijkarte
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Is it possible for someone to learn electrical engineering and work in the industry? How common is this? I mean coming from a the software industry I know that there are many including innovative ones are self-taught and have no degrees. Does this apply to engineering as well? How would it be different?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think it would be pretty much impossible to get a job as, say, an Electrical Engineer, without a degree, although if you have a degree in Computer Science and take some EE courses, it might be possible.

"Self-taught" is not likely to cut it these days in engineering, but it IS possible in the software field.
 
Engineering in computer chip design is really high-tech. Really, really high tech. Start Googling and find out what level of technology is required to prepare the silicone substrate, etch the chips, etc. Can't be done in your garage...
 
"Self-taught" is not likely to cut it these days in engineering, but it IS possible in the software field.

I don't understand how it's possible in software not hardware? Both are very involving subjects. Note that what I'm talking about is not a hobbyist web developer. Let's say a video game developer, and I'm aware of outstanding people who did a lot to the field, even more than "degree-holders" contribution. Both fields require logic, math, and physics, and they are related. Also note that the advances in software made to the electronics engineering industry, using circuit simulation and design software...which itself allows for someone to experiment without the need for 17th century laboratories.

I know I'm asking but at the same time I have an argument, and if you cannot prove me wrong and slam me with an instance where it's absolutely impossible to be a DELFT-TAUGHT engineer, then I can just buy it. UNLESS, "the-other-way-around" which is "self-taught" software developer is impossible as well.
These days have more technology to let us free ourselves from business demands for papers to prove ourselves capable and skilled. We got the technology!

Some people think that computer science is all about writing some code in some cheap RAD languages and that's it. I'm not even talking about this. Again I mean fields like 3D computer graphics which is more or less nuclear physics.

I'm also aware of engineering association and registries that you have to belong to to get a job, but...whatever who cares, we all know why they exist. ;)

Can't be done in your garage...

But it can be done on my computer, using some electronic design software. And as software engineers say, implementation is something easy can be handed out to anyone who has the resources and tools.
 
Last edited:
turbo said:
Engineering in computer chip design is really high-tech. Really, really high tech. Start Googling and find out what level of technology is required to prepare the silicone substrate, etch the chips, etc. Can't be done in your garage...

I believe it's possible to build a primitive (8-bit) CPU at home. Surely in a course in electrical engineering, if the assignment was to do so, we could I think. It would be bulky, may take a table-top of parts, lots of wire-wrap, circuit boards, and may have to program it with toggle-switches, but I think it could be done.
 
Last edited:
jackmell said:
I believe it's possible to build a primitive (8-bit) CPU at home. Surely in a course in electrical engineering, if the assignment was to do so, we could I think. It would be bulky, may take a table-top of parts, lots of wire-wrap, circuit boards, and may have to program it with toggle-switches, but I think it could be done.

Yes, I agree with that completely. I don't think it would be worth the effort, but it definitely could be done. You could buy a ROM-burner and burn in some very primitive OS stuff, but again, it would not be worth the effort.
 
Make it 4 bits and it could be even portable.
 
Borek said:
Make it 4 bits and it could be even portable.

No sorry. 8-bits minimum in honor of the 8088 CPU. I think that was the CPU used in the first personal computers. In fact, I would suggest modeling our table-top home-made CPU on the 8088.
 
LoL. I was thinking of an infinity-bit processor with infinity-cores and the size is smaller than a quark, with negligible mass, and speed of infinity-tera flops with wireless connection to the buss made of liquid plasma, no wires...

So getting off topic makes you feel better?

Some really have the attitude of an aged man with no education when they think no farther than the class walls they live in.
 
  • #10
dijkarte said:
LoL. I was thinking of an infinity-bit processor with infinity-cores and the size is smaller than a quark, with negligible mass, and speed of infinity-tera flops with wireless connection to the buss made of liquid plasma, no wires...

So getting off topic makes you feel better?

Some really have the attitude of an aged man with no education when they think no farther than the class walls they live in.
If you want to be reasonable, you might want to be odd nice person here. Not all of all us old farts are fools.
 
  • #11
dijkarte said:
LoL. I was thinking of an infinity-bit processor with infinity-cores and the size is smaller than a quark, with negligible mass, and speed of infinity-tera flops with wireless connection to the buss made of liquid plasma, no wires...

So getting off topic makes you feel better?

Some really have the attitude of an aged man with no education when they think no farther than the class walls they live in.

The title of the thread was making a CPU at home. This is an engineering forum. Everything I said made perfect engineering sense and supported the title of this thread. What you said did not but was rather childish and silly. If you don't want to talk about building CPUs at home then don't title your thread "Wanna Make a CPU at Home"!
 
  • #12
Borek said:
Make it 4 bits and it could be even portable.

jackmell said:
No sorry. 8-bits minimum in honor of the 8088 CPU. I think that was the CPU used in the first personal computers.

There are probably far more 4-but CPUs out there in calculators, old digital clocks, electronic toys etc than there ever were 8-bit CPUs in the early personal computers. The 4-bit Texas Instruments TMS1000 stayed in production for about 20 years (well into the 1990s)

Those 4-bit CPUs "only" had about 2500 transistors, so designing and building a "clone" shoudln't be out of the question if you want a large but rather pointless project to tackle.
 
  • #13
dijkarte said:
Some really have the attitude of an aged man with no education when they think no farther than the class walls they live in.

To misquote Shakespeare, "Some are born with attitude, some achieve it, and some have attitude thrust upon 'em" :smile:
 
  • #14
dijkarte, you wrote in post #4: "Some people think that computer science is all about writing some code in some cheap RAD languages and that's it. I'm not even talking about this. Again I mean fields like 3D computer graphics which is more or less nuclear physics."

So, you say 3D computer graphics is more or less nuclear physics. That seems odd. I never learned that! What is your source reference for this?
 
  • #15
dijkarte, you wrote in post #4: "I'm also aware of engineering association and registries that you have to belong to to get a job, but...whatever who cares, we all know why they exist. ;)"

Will you please explain what we all know about why engineering associations and registries exist? ;(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K