Why do entangled particles have to be in an indeterminate state?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of entangled particles, specifically why they are considered to be in an indeterminate state. Participants explore the implications of quantum mechanics, particularly regarding measurement, exchange symmetry, and the definitions of entanglement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the assumption that entangled particles must be in an indeterminate state, noting that there are no known particles prior to measurement or interaction according to standard quantum mechanics.
  • Others argue that the probability function must satisfy invariance with the exchange of particles, suggesting that if particles had determined states, it would allow for measurements that could distinguish between them.
  • Participants discuss the importance of exchange symmetry in quantum mechanics, which is posited as a major hypothesis that leads to the existence of bosons and fermions.
  • One participant clarifies that while the wave function does not need to be invariant to particle exchange, the expectation values must be, highlighting a potential source of confusion.
  • Another participant adds that the definition of "entangled" involves being in a stationary state of the multibody Hamiltonian, which is linked to the concept of exchange invariance symmetry.
  • A later reply notes that particles can be entangled in one basis and not in another, indicating that they may be in a superposition in some bases while remaining determined in others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of entangled particles and the implications of quantum mechanics, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of entanglement and exchange symmetry, as well as the unresolved nature of how these concepts apply across different measurement bases.

San K
Messages
905
Reaction score
1
Why do (we assume that) entangled particles (say photons/electrons) have to be in an indeterminate state?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
San K said:
Why do (we assume that) entangled particles have to be in an indeterminate state?


Which 'particles' are in a determined state? There are no known 'particles' prior to measurement/interaction according to standard qm.
 
San K said:
Why do (we assume that) entangled particles (say photons/electrons) have to be in an indeterminate state?

The probability function has to satisfy invariance with exchange of particles. The invariance of measurable properties with exchange of particle index is a major hypothesis in the theory. If the individual particles were in a state where their parameters could be determined precisely, then by definition there would be a measurement that could distinguish between particles.

The invariance of measurable parameters to particle exchange is an important physical symmetry. Sometime it is referred to as "exchange symmetry". It is an important physical postulate in quantum mechanics. One consequence of this condition is the existence of bosons and fermions.

Note that the wave function itself does not have to be invariant to particle exchange because one can never measure the entire wave function. The idea is that the expectation values (i.e., measurable parameters) have to be invariant to particle exchange. The difference between an expectation value being invariant to particle exchange and the wave function being invariant to particle exchange was confusing to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sanpkl
Darwin123 said:
The probability function has to satisfy invariance with exchange of particles. The invariance of measurable properties with exchange of particle index is a major hypothesis in the theory. If the individual particles were in a state where their parameters could be determined precisely, then by definition there would be a measurement that could distinguish between particles.

The invariance of measurable parameters to particle exchange is an important physical symmetry. Sometime it is referred to as "exchange symmetry". It is an important physical postulate in quantum mechanics. One consequence of this condition is the existence of bosons and fermions.

Note that the wave function itself does not have to be invariant to particle exchange because one can never measure the entire wave function. The idea is that the expectation values (i.e., measurable parameters) have to be invariant to particle exchange. The difference between an expectation value being invariant to particle exchange and the wave function being invariant to particle exchange was confusing to me.

Thanks Darwin. Well answered.
 
San K said:
Thanks Darwin. Well answered.
Just one additional fact:
The definition of "entangled" is "being in a stationary state of the multibody Hamiltonian."

A stationary state is an eigenvector of a Hamiltonian.

Under the condition of exchange invariance symmetry, the particle exchange operator and the multibody Hamiltonian have to commute. Furthermore, all stationary states of the multibody Hamiltonian have to eigenvectors of the particle exchange operator.

The condition of particle exchange invariance is really the basis of second quantization. Quantum mechanics is taught in a historical rather than logical sequence. Therefore, one learns about first quantization in the introductory courses. This is quantum mechanics without the postulate of invariance to particle exchange.

Invariance to particle exchange becomes very important whenever the number of particles changes during an interaction. Without understanding that postulate, one can't understand quantum electrodynamics or any quantum field theory.
 
Just a side note: a pair of particles can be entangled on one basis and not entangled on another. I could have know the spin but not momentum, or vice versa. So they could be in a superposition (and indeterminate) in some bases and not others.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sanpkl

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
686
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
243
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K