B Why Do Events Freeze For Me at the Speed of Light?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter RobbyQ
  • Start date Start date
RobbyQ
Messages
31
Reaction score
11
TL;DR Summary
Why Events Freeze For Me
Is my thinking correct ?
Assuming I can see you throughout my journey... If I accelerate away from Earth towards the speed of light and you are waving to me, I start to see your waving slow down and eventually at speed to light your waving stops like a photographic image. Almost like the last image I took of your photons relative to my speed. There is now no new information reaching me. i.e that last image is stuck with me forever ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RobbyQ said:
TL;DR Summary: Why Events Freeze For Me

Is my thinking correct ?
Assuming I can see you throughout my journey... If I accelerate away from Earth towards the speed of light and you are waving to me, I start to see your waving slow down and eventually at speed to light your waving stops like a photographic image. Almost like the last image I took of your photons relative to my speed. There is now no new information reaching me. i.e that last image is stuck with me forever ?
Yes, there is a last instant of your home world's future that you will ever see.

However, this last instant is not seen when you reach the speed of light. It can't be. Because you never reach the speed of light. Instead, there is an instant (on Earth) when it passes beyond your Rindler horizon. Ideally, the light speed information from Earth never stops arriving. Though as a practical matter you'll see the Earth fade into red-shifted darkness long before that.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeterDonis, RobbyQ and FactChecker
What you see in a scenario like this depends on the travel time of light from an event on Earth to your spaceship. This sort of effect is not in itself relevant to the theory of relativity.

Indeed, in classical mechanics, you could in principle exceed the speed of light and you would see all sorts of weird effects in such a scenario.

Although the special theory of relativity can describe accelerating reference frames, it's more usual to present the basic theory in terms of inertial frames of reference.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
98
Views
7K
Back
Top