# Can an Object Exceed the Speed of Light?

• B
• isotope493
In summary, this thought experiment suggests that it is possible for a vessel to exceed the speed of light.
isotope493
I was curious if the relative speed of an object can exceed the speed of light. Specifically, I am curious about the following thought experiment. I am not a physicists (and if I were asking the following would make me a poor one) and it has been 20 years since college physics.

If a vessel is traveling at speed X (less than the speed of light) on a vector heading of A away from the fixed object M and object Q is traveling within the vessel on the same heading of vector A at a speed of Y (less than the speed of light), can the speed of Q relative to object M (X+Y) equal or exceed the speed of light? While I not assuming the vessel has to be a space vessel or that the vessel or object have to be in a vacuum, that is my natural inclination as it makes it easier to dismiss the need to muddy the experiment with friction and gravity. As for how object Q is being propelled within the vessel, I have no specific constraints. However, to avoid muddying the water, I would assume however it is being propelled within the vessel that the force is negligible on the vessels speed away from M. So, if object Q is being propelled on a rail with a rocket, the size of the vessel is too large for the velocity of the vessel to slow in any meaningful fashion. Perhaps we can assume that Q isn't fixed in any way to the vessel (and gravity is a non factor) but instead is highly magnetic and a massive electromagnet sits just ahead of the vessel (but not attached to the vessel) and when it is turned on it attracts Q toward it in the same vector heading as the vessel (and we assume the electromagnet has negligible effect on the vessel).

If it is possible in some sort of scenario that X+Y = C relative to M, let me expand this to ask one more question. From what I remember/understand, light instantaneously reaches C the moment a photon comes into being and C does not change relative to another objects speed (i.e. it is not additive). Let's assume that a laser (emitting all photons in vector heading A) is fixed to object M and a human is seated at the front of M looking back toward the laser light. Once emitted, relative to M, the photons are traveling along vector A at C. If X+Y=C, then relative to M, the person in front of the light is also traveling a C away from M on vector heading A. It would seem that the light would not catch up with the person (until object Q slowed/stopped). If this is this is so, wouldn't the person have to be traveling at the speed of light? And, if this is true, the person would only be traveling at the speed of light because of an additive property allowing for the speed of the vessel and relative speed of the object Q to equal or exceed C. Lastly, if this were somehow possible, what does the person see when Q stops and the photons move "forward?" From what I understand, photons can occupy the same space (I reason this from my understanding photons can pass through one another) and during the period Q is at C, as each new photon is emitted (since everything is traveling on vector heading A ... and let's assume the laser is so perfect each photon can be emitted with such precision), it will occupy the same space. So, when Q stops, will a person see an intense (depending on duration of Q traveling relative to the vessel) "photon" of light.

I imagine there are many fallacies to my thought experiment and would love to learn what I a missing that doesn't make this possible. Thanks.

isotope493 said:
I was curious if the relative speed of an object can exceed the speed of light. Specifically, I am curious about the following thought experiment. I am not a physicists (and if I were asking the following would make me a poor one) and it has been 20 years since college physics.

What you need is the relativistic velocity additiona formula. See here, for example:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/velocity.html

Ibix
You can also google "relativistic velocity addition", which answers your immediate question. Velocities do not add linearly, so if the craft has velocity ##u## and the object inside it has speed ##v## as measured by the craft, an external observer will measure velocity$$\frac{u+v}{1+uv/c^2}$$This never exceeds ##c##.

Thanks. I will do more reading on that to expand my understanding.

berkeman
mcastillo356 said:
Fine apart from the final paragraph, which is wrong. The speed of a light pulse as measured by another light pulse is undefined, not ##c##. The velocity addition formula apparently works, but is derived from the Lorentz transforms which require at least one of the objects to be moving slower than ##c## in order for there to be a definable reference frame.

(Note that it's using a different sign convention from me, which is why its version of the velocity addition formula has minus signs).

Well, I just knew that ##c## it's a constant. It is the same in every frame of reference.

mcastillo356 said:
Well, I just knew that ##c## it's a constant. It is the same in every frame of reference.
Yes, but you can't define a frame of reference traveling at ##c##. So there's no way to define what speed a light pulse would measure anything else traveling at, including another light pulse.

mcastillo356
I think the quote you mention is unfortunate.

It's rather poor. Given a quick look at the author's publications I don't doubt that he knows better. Unfortunately in some contexts some people seem to decide to provide some sort of answer to an invalid question, instead of challenging the incorrect assumptions that underlie it. To be fair, that kind of thing is easier to do in a forum like this one where there's space for some back-and-forth discussion with the person who initially asked the question, but still...

Let's say I am in an inertial frame of reference and I note two objects moving towards each other. Object 1 has velocity v1 to the right and object 2 has velocity v2 to the left. In my frame of reference, their speed of approach (relative speed according to me) is v1 + v2 which can be > c. But this is not the speed of either object in any inertial reference frame, it's just a calculated quantity.

Ibix
pixel said:
But this is not the speed of either object in any inertial reference frame, it's just a calculated quantity.
I've taken to calling it "separation rate" (I don't know if it has an official name) to keep it distinct from "relative velocity", which does seem to be used for the velocity each one measures the other to be doing.

The two concepts are the same in Newtonian physics, but not relativistic physics.

Dale

## What is the speed of light?

The speed of light is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second in a vacuum. This is considered to be the fastest speed at which energy or information can travel.

## Why is the speed of light considered to be the universal speed limit?

According to Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, the speed of light is the maximum speed at which all matter and information in the universe can travel. This is because as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases and it requires an infinite amount of energy to accelerate it further.

## Can any object exceed the speed of light?

Based on our current understanding of physics, it is not possible for any object to exceed the speed of light. As an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases and it requires an infinite amount of energy to accelerate it further.

## What happens if an object were to exceed the speed of light?

If an object were to exceed the speed of light, it would violate the laws of physics as we know them. This would have profound implications on our understanding of the universe and could potentially lead to paradoxes such as time travel.

## Are there any exceptions to the speed of light being the universal speed limit?

There are some theories, such as the Alcubierre drive, that propose ways to theoretically exceed the speed of light by manipulating space-time. However, these are still theoretical and have not been proven to be possible. Additionally, the speed of light can be slowed down in certain mediums, but it still remains the maximum speed at which energy and information can travel in those mediums.

• Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
991
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
45
Views
3K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
2K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
33
Views
2K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
1K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
3K