The discussion revolves around the dismissal of Michael Behe's ideas on Intelligent Design by evolutionary scientists, particularly in the context of a book review of Behe's "The Edge of Evolution" by Richard Dawkins. The conversation touches on themes of scientific credibility, the reception of Behe's arguments, and the broader implications for the Intelligent Design movement.
Participants generally agree on the critical stance towards Behe's ideas and the effectiveness of Dawkins' rebuttal. However, the discussion reflects a range of opinions on the implications of Behe's work and the future of the Intelligent Design movement, indicating that multiple competing views remain.
Some statements reflect personal opinions on the quality of Behe's arguments and the impact of his work on the scientific community, but these are subjective and not universally accepted. The discussion also references specific events and responses that may not be fully detailed in the posts.
The second is the book of a man who has given up. Trapped along a false path of his own rather unintelligent design, Behe has left himself no escape. Poster boy of creationists everywhere, he has cut himself adrift from the world of real science. And real science, in the shape of his own department of biological sciences at Lehigh University, has publicly disowned him, via a remarkable disclaimer on its Web site: “While we respect Prof. Behe’s right to express his views, they are his alone and are in no way endorsed by the department.
Indeed. Dawkins really slapped him silly. Gotta love it!Kurdt said:Go Dawkins.
Doc Al said:Indeed. Dawkins really slapped him silly. Gotta love it!