Dremmer
- 92
- 0
Why do you think that's the case?
The discussion revolves around the perception and reality of time, exploring whether time is a fundamental aspect of the universe or a human construct. Participants engage with philosophical implications, scientific theories, and psychological perspectives related to the concept of time.
Participants express a range of views on the nature of time, with no consensus reached. Some see time as a fundamental aspect of reality, while others argue it is a construct. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.
Participants highlight the philosophical and psychological dimensions of the question, indicating that the discussion may lack a clear scientific framework. There are also references to specific theories and philosophical arguments that are not universally accepted.
I suppose we could add another aspect philisophically speaking and say the converse is aslo true - We perceive change by the passage of time.We perceive time by change.
256bits said:I suppose we could add another aspect philisophically speaking and say the converse is aslo true - We perceive change by the passage of time.

jtbell said:Ohhh nooooo, not another "what is time" thread!
https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=3106