Why do metals in metal carbonyls have 0 OS?

  • Thread starter Thread starter takando12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal Metals Os
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the oxidation state of metals in metal carbonyls, specifically questioning why these metals are considered to have a 0 oxidation state. The scope includes conceptual clarification and exploratory reasoning regarding oxidation states in coordination compounds.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the reasoning behind the metals in metal carbonyls having a 0 oxidation state.
  • One participant suggests that oxidation number represents a hypothetical charge if a compound were ionic, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the concept.
  • Another participant clarifies that carbonyls are not ionic compounds, implying that the oxidation state concept may not apply in the same way.
  • There is confusion about whether a 0 oxidation state means that metals cannot donate electrons, with one participant questioning the absoluteness of "never" in this context.
  • It is noted that while metals in carbonyls do not donate electrons, they may do so in other types of compounds.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty and confusion regarding the implications of a 0 oxidation state, and there is no consensus on the interpretation of oxidation states in this context.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in understanding the definitions and implications of oxidation states, particularly in non-ionic compounds like carbonyls. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of electron donation in relation to oxidation states.

takando12
Messages
122
Reaction score
5
That's pretty much it. Why do they have 0 Oxidation state?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Why not?
 
Borek said:
Why not?
Oxidation number is like a hypothetical value for the charge of the individual species if a compound was considered ionic(atleast that's what i understood).
So when we say the OS of metals in metal carbonyls is 0, are we saying that they can never donate any electrons? I am confused , i don't understand.
 
takando12 said:
if a compound was considered ionic

Carbonyls aren't ionic.

takando12 said:
So when we say the OS of metals in metal carbonyls is 0, are we saying that they can never donate any electrons?

Why 'never'? They don't in carbonyls, they do in other compounds.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K