Hi, I'm looking for intuition and/or logic as to why we would want or need morphisms according to axioms in category theory, to imply that in the category of rings, they must preserve the identity (unless codomain is "0").(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Thank you very much.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Why do morphisms in category of rings respect identity

Loading...

Similar Threads for morphisms category rings | Date |
---|---|

I What is the equivalent of a group in category theory? | Nov 7, 2017 |

How can the kernel of a ring morphism be a subring? | Dec 24, 2014 |

Algebriac Geometry - Morphisms of Algebraic Sets | Nov 3, 2013 |

Composition of Functions - in the context of morphisms in algebraic ge | Nov 1, 2013 |

Algebriac Geometry - Morphisms of Algebraic Sets | Nov 1, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**