Why Do Significant Digits Include Uncertain Numbers?

Click For Summary
The number 3568 +/- 42 has two significant digits because the uncertainty affects the hundreds place, making it significant despite being uncertain. Significant digits include all certain digits and one uncertain digit, which is crucial for understanding precision in measurements. The discussion highlights the importance of distinguishing between certain and uncertain digits when determining significant figures. Writing in scientific notation can clarify the representation of significant digits, but it can also lead to confusion if not applied correctly. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurate communication of numerical data.
Gauss M.D.
Messages
151
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



How many significant digits does the number 3568 +/- 42 have?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The true value is ranging between 3526 and 3610. Why is there two significant digits and not one? I can't even find a specific definition of significant digits anywhere, just random examples.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gauss M.D. said:
The true value is ranging between 3526 and 3610. Why is there two significant digits and not one? I can't even find a specific definition of significant digits anywhere, just random examples.

It's about the places of error, here the error doesn't exist in the thousand's place. Hundred's place is uncertain in spite of the fact that it is significant!
I hope this helps!

Edit: It always helps to write in scientific notation...usually after rounding off its written as:

##(357±4)\times10=(3.57±0.04)\times10^3##

You are mixing up "certain and uncertain digits" with "significant digits"!...Significant digits include all certain digits and one uncertain digit!...Here digit "3" is certain whereas digit "5", "6", "8" are uncertain in 3568 as you already mentioned due to comparatively large error.

Even scientific notation can mislead you if you aren't careful!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K