Why do some of you use make-a-layman-scratch-head kinda words?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blank.black
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of complex vocabulary in everyday conversations, particularly in interactions with individuals in casual settings, such as store clerks. Participants explore the appropriateness and implications of using specialized or "fancy" words outside of academic or technical contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern that using complex vocabulary may alienate individuals who are not familiar with such terms, particularly in casual settings.
  • Others argue that the choice of words is influenced by the social context and relationship with the listener, suggesting that clarity can sometimes be achieved with more precise terminology.
  • A participant mentions avoiding complex vocabulary when discussing technical subjects like quantum field theory with non-experts.
  • Examples of "fancy" words are requested, with some participants humorously suggesting terms like "sublimation" and "Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious."
  • There is a discussion about the balance between using a broader vocabulary and ensuring comprehension by the listener, with some advocating for simplification when necessary.
  • One participant shares an anecdote about using a technical term ("IEC power cord") and having to simplify their explanation to ensure understanding.
  • Another participant challenges the notion that using complex vocabulary is inherently superior, suggesting that it can lead to misunderstandings.
  • Some participants highlight the potential for miscommunication when specialized terms are used without consideration of the listener's background.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a range of opinions on the appropriateness of using complex vocabulary in casual conversations. There is no clear consensus, as some advocate for maintaining a higher level of vocabulary while others emphasize the importance of accessibility and understanding.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific examples and personal experiences to illustrate their points, but the discussion remains largely anecdotal and subjective, with no formal definitions or standards established for what constitutes "fancy" vocabulary.

blank.black
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I understand that sometimes there is no choice but to use these never-heard-of high/strong vocabulary words but I mean when you go to the store or mall or some place of that sort where you come across different people from different walks of life, even at such places do you still use these kinda words? I mean does it ever occur to you that a store clerk may not have the slightest clue of what you are talking about? Or do you realize that and just use those "fancy" words on purpose?
 
Science news on Phys.org
When I discuss quantum field theory with store clerks, I avoid using never-heard-of high/strong vocabulary words.
 
What words to use and way of talking is intuitively determined by the social relationship with the people you are talking about. I think most people would feel weird using terms common to mathematical arguments such as "if and only if" in a non-mathematical setting, even though they may use them often when discussing mathematics. The appeal of such "strong" terms is that they have a much more clear-cut meaning than "ordinary" words.
 
Last edited:
Can you give us examples of these "make-a-layman-scratch-head kinda words" that "we" use in public?
 
blank.black said:
I understand that sometimes there is no choice but to use these never-heard-of high/strong vocabulary words but I mean when you go to the store or mall or some place of that sort where you come across different people from different walks of life, even at such places do you still use these kinda words? I mean does it ever occur to you that a store clerk may not have the slightest clue of what you are talking about? Or do you realize that and just use those "fancy" words on purpose?

Maybe we should talk down to people, then?
 
blank.black said:
I understand that sometimes there is no choice but to use these never-heard-of high/strong vocabulary words but I mean when you go to the store or mall or some place of that sort where you come across different people from different walks of life, even at such places do you still use these kinda words? I mean does it ever occur to you that a store clerk may not have the slightest clue of what you are talking about? Or do you realize that and just use those "fancy" words on purpose?

What fancy words?
 
I too would like to know which words are too fancy to use around store clerks.

Okay, okay, maybe "sublimation", but really, it was all in context and everything when I used it.
 
blank.black said:
I understand that sometimes there is no choice but to use these never-heard-of high/strong vocabulary words but I mean when you go to the store or mall or some place of that sort where you come across different people from different walks of life, even at such places do you still use these kinda words? I mean does it ever occur to you that a store clerk may not have the slightest clue of what you are talking about? Or do you realize that and just use those "fancy" words on purpose?


. . . oughta' be a crime to describe something without giving real examples.
 
Jimmy Snyder said:
When I discuss quantum field theory with store clerks, I avoid using never-heard-of high/strong vocabulary words.

My thoughts precisey. The last time I used a long word with a store clerk in a deep discussion of the quantum world I got kicked out of the store... without my goods.
 
  • #10
The way that I post here is the same as the way that I speak in person, other than the fact that I don't always use complete sentences in person. If there is an indication that someone doesn't understand me, I "dummy it down" to whatever extent is required.
 
  • #11
I used the phrase "IEC power cord" in BestBuy in an attempt to buy a computer power lead.
I think in the end I managed to make the sales assistant understand - "bendy wire thing goes into magic hole in wall where invisible stuff comes out and makes glowing box work"
 
  • #12
mgb_phys said:
I used the phrase "IEC power cord" in BestBuy in an attempt to buy a computer power lead.
I think in the end I managed to make the sales assistant understand - "bendy wire thing goes into magic hole in wall where invisible stuff comes out and makes glowing box work"
:smile:
 
  • #13
blank.black said:
I understand that sometimes there is no choice but to use these never-heard-of high/strong vocabulary words but I mean when you go to the store or mall or some place of that sort where you come across different people from different walks of life, even at such places do you still use these kinda words? I mean does it ever occur to you that a store clerk may not have the slightest clue of what you are talking about? Or do you realize that and just use those "fancy" words on purpose?

It's hard to read such clumsy writing. We use a broader vocabulary in order to avoid all those unnecessary hyphens and run-on sentences! Look at how much difficulty you have expressing yourself...
 
  • #14
An example - when someone asks you "how are you doing today?"...do you seriously reply saying "i am doing Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!"?
 
  • #15
Ben Niehoff said:
It's hard to read such clumsy writing. We use a broader vocabulary in order to avoid all those unnecessary hyphens and run-on sentences! Look at how much difficulty you have expressing yourself...

ok...but think about how much difficulty store clerks would have in understanding your "broader vocabulary"...eventually leading to you using "unnecessary hyphens and run-on sentences".
 
  • #16
OP, you talk down to people on purpose?

I have a friend who failed out of university but I wouldn't be surprised if he can destroy any of us with words. He's hardcore into philosophy and I haven't got a clue what he's saying sometimes. I just ask him to explain and tell him the words I don't know. I have no problem doing that and he has no problem explaining.

If a store clerk or a stranger has no clue what I'm saying and is too afraid to ask me what I mean, then it's their problem. I'm not going to pre-adjust to everyone just because everyone might be afraid.
 
  • #17
An example - when someone asks you "how are you doing today?"...do you seriously reply saying "i am doing Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!"?

Indubitably.
 
  • #18
brushman said:
Indubitably.

That doesn't count as a difficult word; everyone who watches Bugs Bunny knows it. :biggrin:
 
  • #19
blank.black said:
An example - when someone asks you "how are you doing today?"...do you seriously reply saying "i am doing Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious!"?

:bugeye: This is the example you give? Is this whole thread based on a freak incident that you experienced by any chance? I'm pretty sure that I've never heard anyone say that word except in the context of talking about long words or in a discussion about stories-set-in-England-about-a-nanny-who-can-fly-using-her-umbrella-like like movies.
 
  • #20
Jamma said:
:bugeye: This is the example you give? Is this whole thread based on a freak incident that you experienced by any chance? I'm pretty sure that I've never heard anyone say that word except in the context of talking about long words or in a discussion about stories-set-in-England-about-a-nanny-who-can-fly-using-her-umbrella-like like movies.

Now that is a very long albeit hyphenated word!
 
  • #21
I must say, floccinaucinihilipilification is quite un-supercalifragilisticexpialidocious, especially in Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch!
 
  • #24
Ben Niehoff said:
You mean "reciting"; not "iterating".

I had a quick glance at the name and it seemed to be almost iterating. Some words were at least repeated over and over again in similar sequences. Reciting would perhaps have been a more suitable word.
 
  • #25
I was compelled to read an entry on divine simplicity in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy the other day by a link from an opinion blog in the New York Times which was the absolute height of bizarrely obtuse and convoluted language. If you think scientists are bad, don't ever, ever talk to a theologian.
 
  • #26
Hmmm.

Intelligent people try to communicate their message in the most effective way possible; they don't use "big" words unless they are trying to make a strong point. Jerks are usually the ones who use "big" words to try to impress you but that's because they are generally spewing garbage (economists, in particular).
 
  • #27
I don't think many people are noticing that the type of scenario they are imagining is not at all similar to the one the OP is flustered by based on his example
 
  • #28
Office_Shredder said:
I don't think many people are noticing that the type of scenario they are imagining is not at all similar to the one the OP is flustered by based on his example
No kidding, his example is a song from Mary Poppins? In other words nonsense? Was intentionally not included in the op and wasted member's time?

What is a mythical creature similar to an orc?
 
  • #29
Evo said:
What is a mythical creature similar to an orc?
In Tolkien's mythology, the nearest is a goblin... but orcs show up in different forms in different creators' work.
 
  • #30
Danger said:
In Tolkien's mythology, the nearest is a goblin... but orcs show up in different forms in different creators' work.
Guess again, starts with a "t", not as intelligent as an orc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K