Why Do Star Systems and Galaxies Flatten in the 3rd Dimension?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dropout
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reduction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Star systems and galaxies exhibit a tendency to flatten in the third dimension due to the conservation of angular momentum. As these celestial bodies form from a rotating cloud of gas and dust, they naturally align their mass in a plane perpendicular to their angular momentum vector. This flattening process is not related to entropy but is a fundamental characteristic of how matter interacts under gravitational forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum in astrophysics
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational forces and their effects on celestial bodies
  • Familiarity with the formation of galaxies and star systems
  • Concept of dimensionality in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of angular momentum in astrophysical contexts
  • Explore the dynamics of galaxy formation and evolution
  • Study the role of gravitational forces in shaping celestial structures
  • Investigate the concept of dimensionality and its implications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the dynamics of star systems and galaxies.

Dropout
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Like entropy tends towards chaos, why do star systems or galaxies tend to reduce their movement through the 3rd "Z" dimension even though all particles can freely move in all 3 dimensions? Flattening out.

Is there some sort of word or phrase which describes this behavior? Is it possible, interacting matter naturally tends to reduce the number of dimensions they are operating in?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's due to conservation of angular momentum.

Galaxies and star systems form out of a cloud with some fixed angular momentum. They will tend to flatten out in the plane normal to their angular momentum.

It has nothing to do with entropy.
 
I know it has nothing to do with entropy, but is there some sort of sub-topic word describing this behavior other then simple angular momentum?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
14K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K