Normal distribution and star density in a Galaxy

  • Thread starter corndog16
  • Start date
Hey all.

I'm working on a personal programming project where I'm attempting to simulate (to a small degree) a galaxy. And I have come across a decent 2D density map for a spiral galaxy. This map (array actually) defines a 128x128 grid of values between 0 and 255 representing the frequency of stars found in that 'sector' of space.

I want to expand this density map into the 3rd dimension and I figure a good way to do that would be to define the height of the galaxy as being n sectors tall and then use a normal distribution curve to distribute the density value (something between 0 and 255) vertically across those 5 sectors.

My question is, how would I take a number, say 234, and divide it among n 'boxes' or 'sectors' so that it has a normal curve type distribution?
I attempted to Google this, but I found that what was coming up did not describe what I was looking for so I'm thinking that I don't currently have the vocabulary to describe this particular intent.
 

Stephen Tashi

Science Advisor
6,609
1,015
My question is, how would I take a number, say 234, and divide it among n 'boxes' or 'sectors' so that it has a normal curve type distribution?
A normal distribution has two parameters, the mean [itex] \mu [/itex] and the standard deviation [itex] \sigma [/itex]. Lets say we have 128 boxes. Imagine the boxes as spaces between a ruler that has marks at 0,1,2,..128. Assuming you want the middle of the distribution to be at the middle of the ruler, set [itex] \mu = 64 [/itex].

Then you have to decide on a value for [itex] \sigma [/itex]. A normal distribution has non-zero values from [itex] - \infty [/itex] to [itex] +\infty [/itex], so you have to decide what part of the distribution you are going to leave out or you have to settle for a distribution that doesn't exactly match a normal distribution by forcing all of the stars to be within the 128 boxes.

For most programming languages, you can find a library with a function that give the values of the cumulative normal distibution. Let's assume that such a function is

[itex] F(\mu,\sigma,x) = \int_{-\infty}^x f(\mu,\sigma,x) dx [/itex] where [itex] f(\mu,\sigma,x) [/itex] is the density of a normal distribution.

The fraction of stars between marks [itex] A [/itex] and [itex] B [/itex] on the ruler is

[itex] F(64,\sigma,B) - F(64,\sigma,A) [/itex].

So the fraction of stars between the 0 and 128 marks is

[itex] M = F(64,\sigma,128) - F(64,\sigma,0) [/itex]

The fraction that are outside those marks is [itex] 1 - M [/itex].

The fraction of stars in the kth box is [itex] s_k = F(64,\sigma,k) - F(64,\sigma,k-1) [/itex]. If you want to "renormalize" so that all the stars fall in the marks between 0 and 128, you can make the fraction of stars in the kth box [itex] \frac{s_k}{1-M} [/itex]

For 234 total stars, the number of stars in the kth box will be [itex] (s_k)(234) [/itex]. So it won't always be a whole number. To convert to a while number, you'll have to decide how to round things off. (If you want the grand total to remain 234, you'll have to round off in a special way!)

The above calculations don't determine a unique value for [itex] \sigma [/itex]. You'll have to try various values to find one that you like if your goal is only to have a pleasing picture. If you are doing a physical simulation of moving stars, we'll have to investigate the problem further.
 
Hi,
Any chance you could post your source for the 2D Density Map you have? I'm looking for exactly that
Thanks
Dave
 

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top