High School Why do subatomic particles change what they do when observed?

Click For Summary
Subatomic particles exhibit a change in behavior upon observation due to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, where a particle's state does not have a definite value until measured. This measurement causes the particle's state to collapse into a specific eigenstate related to the observable being measured. The identity of the observer, whether a sentient human or a non-sentient robot, does not affect the outcome of the measurement; it is the act of measurement itself that is crucial. Most measurements are conducted by devices, with humans interpreting the results rather than influencing the measurement process. Ultimately, the nature of observation in quantum mechanics remains a fundamental aspect of the theory.
curiosity1
Messages
15
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Measurement problem of quantum mechanics
Why do subatomic particles change what they do when observed? Does it matter who is doing the observing? What happens if a non-sentient robot does the observing? How does that compare with a sentient human doing the observing? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
curiosity1 said:
Summary: Measurement problem of quantum mechanics

Why do subatomic particles change what they do when observed?
The dynamic quantity being measured does not have a definite value until a measurement is made.

After the measurement, the state of the particle "collapses" to an eigenstate of the observable that was measured.

That's essentially an axiom of QM. It's like a law of nature, so there is no more fundamental explanation.
curiosity1 said:
What happens if a non-sentient robot does the observing? How does that compare with a sentient human doing the observing? Thank you.
It makes no difference what makes the measurement. Most if not all, measurements are made by measurement devices and human beings only look at the output from those.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes curiosity1 and malawi_glenn
Thank you very much for your quick and helpful reply.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K