Why do tensile testing graphs show a negative slope at these regions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of tensile testing graphs, specifically addressing why these graphs exhibit a negative slope in certain regions. It is established that tensile testing machines do not reduce the load value; rather, the graphs reflect engineering stress, which does not account for the decreasing cross-sectional area of the specimen during testing. True stress, which considers the actual area, would show a continuous increase in stress. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding elastic and plastic deformation, work hardening, and the differences in stress-strain curves between ductile and brittle materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensile testing principles
  • Knowledge of engineering stress vs. true stress
  • Familiarity with material deformation behavior (elastic and plastic)
  • Concept of work hardening in materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "True Stress vs. Engineering Stress" in material science
  • Study "Plastic Deformation and Work Hardening" mechanisms
  • Explore "Stress-Strain Curves for Different Materials" including ductile and brittle examples
  • Learn about "Tensile Testing Machine Calibration" for accurate measurements
USEFUL FOR

Material scientists, mechanical engineers, and students studying material properties and tensile testing methodologies will benefit from this discussion.

gikiian
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Do tensile testing machines reduce the value of load in these regions? If yes, why? If no, what's happening in the graph?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    2.9 KB · Views: 1,085
Engineering news on Phys.org
Most of the time, the plots show engineering stress. You input the cross sectional area, A, of the specimen, and the machine will give you a plot of Force/(A)const for every incremental displacement. In reality, "A" is changing (decreasing, in a tensile test), rather than remaining constant. If you were to plot the "true stress" - Force/(A)actual, the stress should always increase.
 
These are regions of dynamic elongation in which the transferred force level is falling even as the specimen continues to elongate. If this continues very far (as is the case at the right end), rupture occurs.

These are really scaled force plotted against scaled elongation curves. With convenient scaling, we can think of them as stress - strain curves, but in the dynamic regions, this is not strictly true.
 
It's an issue of lateral contraction and whether or not it is being considered.

As OldEngr63 states, engineering stress vs. strain is just a scaled version of force vs. deformation. Either way, you'd get a plot that looks like the one the TS posted.

As I said before, however, true stress vs. strain would NOT look like the plot that the TS posted.
 
gikiian said:
Do tensile testing machines reduce the value of load in these regions? If yes, why? If no, what's happening in the graph?

If you are asking what is happening to the sample, the graph shows the elastic and plastic deformatiom. As the stress is increased the material deforms elastically, which is the straight line region. At a value of stress the material begins to deform plastically and the material begins to neck down at the same or less level of stress. While this material is deforming plastically it is also work hardening, until the point in the graph where the curve swings upwards again ( workhardening has made the material stronger ). As you progress along the curve, more stress results in more plastic deformation, and more work hardening, until the ultimate tesile stress is reached, after which the specimen necks down and rupture occurs.

The curve appears to be that for some sort of soft metal, possibly a mild steel. Not all materials exhibit the same pattern in their stress strain curve - a brittle material shows a curve decisively different from that of a ductile materail.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
20K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K