Why do we often misunderstand expressions?
- Thread starter DrClaude
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Expressions
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
55 replies · 11K views
Discussion
Physics news on Phys.org
Dembadon
Gold Member
- 660
- 88
A friend always thought "crap-shoot" was "crab-shoot". He reasoned that trying to shoot a bunch of crabs skittering about would be difficult because they are small and agile. I laughed pretty hard.
zoobyshoe
- 6,514
- 1,255
"Pool sharp," was misheard as "pool shark" so often that the latter is now accepted as correct, and the former as a mistake.
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 6,999
- 299
As a Brit, I sometimes have trouble with American names in phone calls etc. I spent months thinking Wayne Tygert was Wayne Tiger, and Randy Seager was Randy Seagull. (And as a Brit, it doesn't seem at all impossible that an American would be called Randy Seagull...)
The worst horror story was a Texan lady called Arlene, which didn't compute even when it was spelled out several times in a Texan accent. (The nearest UK equivalent would be Eileen).
The worst horror story was a Texan lady called Arlene, which didn't compute even when it was spelled out several times in a Texan accent. (The nearest UK equivalent would be Eileen).
Evo
Staff Emeritus
- 24,114
- 3,277
Voilà. Every day on tv I hear people saying "Wallah!". One day a member in chat said "wallah" and everyone jumped on them, they said they'd been watching a cooking show and had closed captioning on and since the tv celebrity said "wallah!", the caption said "wallah!". 
It's voilà. With a "v".
@@@@@@@@@@
Au jus - "with jus (sauce, gravy, drippings)
You can serve something with jus as in "roast beef au jus".
You cannot serve someone a "with with jus" as in "Roast beef with au jus"
You cannot make a "with jus" as in "make an au jus".
But this is becoming another American bastardization, changing "au jus" from an adjective to a noun.
It's voilà. With a "v".
@@@@@@@@@@
Au jus - "with jus (sauce, gravy, drippings)
You can serve something with jus as in "roast beef au jus".
You cannot serve someone a "with with jus" as in "Roast beef with au jus"
You cannot make a "with jus" as in "make an au jus".
But this is becoming another American bastardization, changing "au jus" from an adjective to a noun.
Last edited:
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 5,850
- 553
One of my friends thought "lactose intolerant" was "lactose and tolerant".
- 19,385
- 15,622
One that I've always thought hilarious was reported by writer John Irving, one of whose characters is afraid to go swimming in the ocean because he was warned about what he understood to be the giant frog that lives there. The "under toad".
Evo
Staff Emeritus
- 24,114
- 3,277
"once and a while" (once in a while)
"For all intensive purposes" (For all intents and purposes)
"tow the line" it's "toe the line"
We had a mentor that would say 'treat them with "kit gloves", he meant "kid gloves"
"For all intensive purposes" (For all intents and purposes)
"tow the line" it's "toe the line"
We had a mentor that would say 'treat them with "kit gloves", he meant "kid gloves"
Evo
Staff Emeritus
- 24,114
- 3,277
The "under toad", that's awesome!phinds said:One that I've always thought hilarious was reported by writer John Irving, one of whose characters is afraid to go swimming in the ocean because he was warned about what he understood to be the giant frog that lives there. The "under toad".
Dembadon
Gold Member
- 660
- 88
Drakkith said:Lol, I thought "Misunderstood expressions" meant math expressions at first.
A mere misunderstanding of the misunderstood expressions expression.
Tobias Funke
- 132
- 40
"Begs the question" is one I would think would bother a lot of people here. The incorrect meaning is pretty much standard now though, so I don't really mind it.
Expressions that at least one person has misunderstood:
I used to think "for which it stands" in the Pledge of Allegiance was "for witches' stands", and would picture a bunch of witches running a lemonade stand. It's not as easy as it might seem to brainwash a kid to be patriotic, I guess.
Speaking of which, I seem to remember some baseball crowds employing a common misunderstanding of the first few lines of the Star-Spangled Banner after Jose Canseco had a fly ball bounce off his huge melon of a head from whatever horse steroids he was on for a homerun. No, Jose couldn't always see so well.
I thought the doctor said I have eggs in my stomach when he told my parents I had eczema. I believe I had seen or at least heard of the famous scene in Alien by that time too.
Expressions that at least one person has misunderstood:
I used to think "for which it stands" in the Pledge of Allegiance was "for witches' stands", and would picture a bunch of witches running a lemonade stand. It's not as easy as it might seem to brainwash a kid to be patriotic, I guess.
Speaking of which, I seem to remember some baseball crowds employing a common misunderstanding of the first few lines of the Star-Spangled Banner after Jose Canseco had a fly ball bounce off his huge melon of a head from whatever horse steroids he was on for a homerun. No, Jose couldn't always see so well.
I thought the doctor said I have eggs in my stomach when he told my parents I had eczema. I believe I had seen or at least heard of the famous scene in Alien by that time too.
reenmachine
Gold Member
- 514
- 9
How about the classic "I could care less" I keep reading again and again.
Evo
Staff Emeritus
- 24,114
- 3,277
That one kills me, we actually had people in another thread trying to defend it's use.reenmachine said:How about the classic "I could care less" I keep reading again and again.
Science Advisor
- 3,766
- 2,215
Nugatory said:An ex-girlfriend once asked why the software that I was hacking on at the time was called the "eunuch's colonel".
Science Advisor
- 3,766
- 2,215
What happens if an Under Toad encounters an escaped Pool Shark? Which one wins?phinds said:[...] afraid to go swimming in the ocean because he was warned about what he understood to be the giant frog that lives there. The "under toad".
Enigman
- 647
- 311
strangerep said:What happens if an Under Toad encounters an escaped Pool Shark? Which one wins?
The Eunuch's colonel shall decide that.
Mentor
- 8,478
- 5,699
And why did Americans start calling main dishes entrées? Entrée means entrance, it is what you start the meal with.Evo said:Au jus - "with jus (sauce, gravy, drippings)
You can serve something with jus as in "roast beef au jus".
You cannot serve someone a "with with jus" as in "Roast beef with au jus"
You cannot make a "with jus" as in "make an au jus".
But this is becoming another American bastardization, changing "au jus" from an adjective to a noun.
Science Advisor
- 4,430
- 327
"Excuse me, while I kiss this guy."
-Jimi Hendrix
-Jimi Hendrix
Science Advisor
- 364
- 87
reenmachine said:How about the classic "I could care less" I keep reading again and again.
Evo said:That one kills me, we actually had people in another thread trying to defend it's use.![]()
Does the expression "I should be so lucky!" bother you, as well?
Usually, a person is expressing the feeling that there's no way he'd ever be that lucky when they use that phrase.
Or does the expression "Cool!" bother you?
Usually, when a person uses that word to react to some interesting feat, they're obviously not referring to the temperature.
Science Advisor
- 3,625
- 3,311
The worst offender in my opinion is "the exception proves the rule" when used to support the "rule" that was just broken.
Evo
Staff Emeritus
- 24,114
- 3,277
Sorry Bob, I don't see how "cool" intentionally used as slang compares to people misunderstanding a grammatically correct phrase and actually thinking that "I could care less" means the same as "I couldn't care less". People actually don't realize that they misheard the original phrase and thought that what they were saying actually meant that they couldn't care less. Same goes for the expression "I should be so lucky", it, like 'cool" are not misunderstandings of a correct expression.BobG said:Does the expression "I should be so lucky!" bother you, as well?
Usually, a person is expressing the feeling that there's no way he'd ever be that lucky when they use that phrase.
Or does the expression "Cool!" bother you?
Usually, when a person uses that word to react to some interesting feat, they're obviously not referring to the temperature.
The correct phrase is "I couldn't care less".
Which is correct: I could care less or I couldn't care less?
The expression I could not care less originally meant 'it would be impossible for me to care less than I do because I do not care at all'. It was originally a British saying and came to the US in the 1950s. It is senseless to transform it into the now-common I could care less. If you could care less, that means you care at least a little. The original is quite sarcastic and the other form is clearly nonsense.
http://dictionary.reference.com/help/faq/language/g09.html
Last edited:
Science Advisor
- 3,625
- 3,311
What, no duck tape?lisab said:I regularly watch for interesting building materials on Craigslist (yeah it's a strange hobby), and it's full of gems.
Wayne's coating. Rot iron. Lam-nut flooring.
Evo
Staff Emeritus
- 24,114
- 3,277
http://duckbrand.com/images/products/280317_386x360.jpgBandersnatch said:What, no duck tape?
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar threads
Undergrad Why Do We Often Confuse 'f' and 'f(x)' in Mathematical Notations?
- Mr Davis 97
- · Replies 4 ·
- General Math
- Replies
- 4